<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<feed xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>New Titles from the National Academies Press | Policy for Science and Technology</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.nap.edu/topics.php?topic=423" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.nap.edu/rss?topic=423"/>
  <id>https://www.nap.edu/rss?topic=423</id>
  <updated>2026-06-09T00:25:59-04:00</updated>
  <subtitle>Science books from the publishers for the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Research Council</subtitle>

  <entry>
    <title>Strategies to Enhance NIH-Funded Pediatric Research Optimizing Child Health</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29346"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2026:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29346#final</id>
    <published>2026-04-30T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2026-04-30T08:00:16-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Recent advances in pediatric health, such as declines in child mortality, would never have happened without significant and consistent federal investment - supported by Congress and led by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Despite these advances, there is broad consensus among experts that child health is in crisis as children in the United States are experiencing rising rates of chronic diseases and poor mental, emotional, and behavioral health.   </p>
<p>NIH tasked the National Academies with convening a committee to examine NIH's pediatric research portfolio and structure and to provide recommendations focused on improving NIH's overall support of pediatric health research. The resulting report provides evidence and eight recommendations to guide NIH's integration of a pediatric and life-course focus throughout its research and funding priorities.</p>            <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29346">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/288'>Health and Medicine</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/386'>Children's Health</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/288'>Health and Medicine</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/391'>Health Sciences</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Supporting Responsible Innovation of Synthetic Cells Biosafety, Biosecurity, and Environmental Considerations</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29325"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2026:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29325#prepub</id>
    <published>2026-04-29T10:44:50-04:00</published>
    <updated>2026-04-29T10:44:54-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Prepublication Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Synthetic cells represent a rapidly advancing frontier in engineering biology, offering new ways to understand living systems and developing innovative solutions across health, environmental management, agriculture, and manufacturing. Constructed from biomolecular components and designed to perform life-like functions, synthetic cells have the potential to enable more predictable, controllable, and adaptable biological technologies with wide-ranging societal and economic benefits.</p>
<p>Supporting Responsible Innovation of Synthetic Cells: Biosafety, Biosecurity, and Environmental Considerations examines how this emerging field can advance while addressing biosafety, biosecurity, and environmental considerations. The report finds that many risks associated with synthetic cells are similar to those posed by existing chemical and microbial systems but may arise in new ways due to novel combinations of features, boundary-blurring system architectures, and emerging applications, creating uncertainty for risk-benefit evaluation and oversight.</p>
<p>To support responsible innovation, the report outlines a path forward grounded in adaptive, evidence-based, and proportionate governance. Key recommendations include establishing a coordinated national biotechnology governance strategy, strengthening the empirical data and research infrastructure for risk assessment, modernizing biosafety and biosecurity oversight, and promoting transparency, public engagement, and international collaboration.</p>
<p>By aligning scientific advancement with adaptive and coordinated governance, this report provides a framework for ensuring that synthetic cell research develops in ways that are safe, secure, and responsive to societal needs, helping realize the promise of this emerging technology while managing uncertainty and risk.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29325">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/278'>Biology and Life Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/314'>Biotechnology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Simplifying Research Regulations and Policies Optimizing American Science</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29231"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2025:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29231#final</id>
    <published>2025-10-10T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2025-11-07T13:44:09-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The U.S. scientific enterprise has produced countless discoveries that have led to significant advances in technology, health, security, safety, and economic prosperity. However, concern exists that excessive, uncoordinated, and duplicative policies and regulations surrounding research are hampering progress and jeopardizing American scientific competitiveness. Estimates suggest the typical U.S. academic researcher spends more than 40 percent of their federally funded research time on administrative and regulatory matters, wasting intellectual capacity and taxpayer dollars. Although administrative and regulatory compliance work can be vital aspects of research, the time spent by researchers on such activities continues to increase because of a dramatic rise in regulations, policies, and requirements over time.</p>
<p>To better ensure that the research community is maximally productive while simultaneously ensuring the safety, accountability, security, and ethical conduct of publicly funded research, Simplifying Research Regulations and Policies: Optimizing American Science examines current federal research regulations. This report identifies ways to improve regulatory processes and administrative tasks, reduce or eliminate unnecessary work, and modify and remove policies and regulations that have outlived their purpose while maintaining necessary and appropriate integrity, accountability, and oversight.  Simplifying Research Regulations provides a roadmap for establishing a more agile and resource-effective regulatory framework for federally funded research.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29231">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Science and Practice of Team Science</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29043"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2025:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29043#final</id>
    <published>2025-09-08T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2025-11-07T13:25:11-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>As scientific problems grow more complex and interdisciplinary, the need for effective, collaborative, and context-sensitive research teams has never been greater. The Science and Practice of Team Science presents an updated, evidence-based roadmap for supporting science teams across a wide variety of domains, disciplines, and organizational structures.</p>
<p>This new report from the National Academies builds on a decade of learning since the landmark Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science report. It examines how evolving forces - including digital innovation, global disruptions, and the rise of virtual collaboration - are reshaping the way scientific teams form, function, and deliver results. From small interdisciplinary groups to large-scale, distributed multiteam systems, today's science teams require flexible strategies tailored to their goals, environments, and challenges.</p>
<p>The Science and Practice of Team Science outlines adaptable practices that enhance team dynamics and productivity across all phases of research - from development to implementation to translation. These include the use of team charters, psychological safety, communication strategies, and project management. This report also emphasizes the role of technology in enabling collaboration while cautioning that tools must be intentionally deployed to support accessibility, training, and integration with workflows.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29043">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/404'>Human Systems and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer For the Year Ended December 31, 2024</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29218"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2025:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29218#final</id>
    <published>2025-08-01T10:44:56-04:00</published>
    <updated>2025-11-07T13:43:23-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2024.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29218">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Principles and Practices for a Federal Statistical Agency Eighth Edition</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27934"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2025:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27934#final</id>
    <published>2025-05-28T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2026-01-29T10:31:41-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The 8th Edition of Principles and Practices for a Federal Statistical Agency supports the essential role of relevant, credible, trusted, independent, and innovative government statistics. Since 1992, this report has described the characteristics of effective federal statistical agencies. Government statistics are widely used to inform decisions by policymakers, program administrators, businesses and other organizations, as well as households and the general public.</p>
<p>Principles and Practices is a concise tool to communicate the unique responsibilities of federal statistical agencies. It underscores the invaluable role that relevant, timely, accurate, and trustworthy government statistics play to inform the public and policymakers. Since 2001, an updated edition is released at the beginning of each presidential term.</p>
<p>This eighth edition retains the five principles and ten practices established in prior editions, including updated examples and extensive appendices to reflect the many and varied changes across the national statistical system that have occurred since the passage of the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018 ("Evidence Act"), the CHIPS and Science Act, and implementing regulations.</p>         <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27934">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/477'>Surveys and Statistics</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/478'>Surveys and Statistics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/478'>Surveys and Statistics</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>International Talent Programs in the Changing Global Environment</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27787"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2024:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27787#final</id>
    <published>2024-12-23T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2024-12-23T08:31:29-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The U.S. science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce plays a vital role in fostering and sustaining innovation, economic competitiveness, and national security. This workforce currently depends, and for the foreseeable future will depend, on both international and domestic talent. Foreign STEM talent contributes to domestic innovation, economic growth, and U.S. leadership in science and technology and also expands perspectives and networks essential to future scientific collaborations and discoveries.</p>
<p>At the request of the U.S. Department of Defense, this report
reviews foreign and domestic talent or incentive programs and
their corresponding scientific, economic, and national security benefits. International Talent Programs in the Changing Global Environment makes recommendations to improve the effectiveness of U.S. mechanisms for attracting and retaining international students and scholars relative to the programs and incentives other nations use to support national research capabilities, especially in national security and defense-related
fields.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27787">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer For the Year Ended December 31, 2023</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27783"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2024:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27783#final</id>
    <published>2024-07-01T09:45:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2024-07-01T09:45:05-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations
as well as a review of the endowment and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2023.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27783">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Toward a New Era of Data Sharing Summary of the US-UK Scientific Forum on Researcher Access to Data</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27520"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2024:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27520#final</id>
    <published>2024-03-28T09:45:07-04:00</published>
    <updated>2024-03-28T09:45:13-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Data are at the forefront of efforts to solve many of today's greatest problems, including climate change, misinformation and disinformation, the threat of future global pandemics, and the quest by people everywhere to lead better lives. But if researchers are going to use data to contribute to the solutions of problems, data need to be available for them to use. Over time, data have become increasingly voluminous, complex, and heterogeneous. Massive volumes of data are being generated by new devices and methods, and many of these data are not easy to analyze, interpret, or share. Groups that generate data may be reluctant to share them for a variety of professional, personal, financial, regulatory, and statutory reasons.</p><p>These issues were addressed during the US-UK Scientific Forum on Researcher Access to Data held in Washington, DC, on September 12-13, 2023. Organized by the National Academy of Sciences and the Royal Society, the forum examined the constellation of issues surrounding researchers' access to data, best practices and lessons learned from exemplary research disciplines, and new ideas and techniques that could drive research forward. This publication summarizes the presentations and discussions of the forum.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27520">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer For the Year Ended December 31, 2022</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27135"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2023:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27135#final</id>
    <published>2023-06-23T08:58:50-04:00</published>
    <updated>2023-06-23T09:01:31-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2022.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27135">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Improving Representation in Clinical Trials and Research Building Research Equity for Women and Underrepresented Groups</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26479"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2022:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26479#final</id>
    <published>2022-07-13T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2022-07-13T10:56:35-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The United States has long made substantial investments in clinical research with the goal of improving the health and well-being of our nation. There is no doubt that these investments have contributed significantly to treating and preventing disease and extending human life. Nevertheless, clinical research faces a critical shortcoming. Currently, large swaths of the U.S. population, and those that often face the greatest health challenges, are less able to benefit from these discoveries because they are not adequately represented in clinical research studies. While progress has been made with representation of white women in clinical trials and clinical research, there has been little progress in the last three decades to increase participation of racial and ethnic minority population groups. This underrepresentation is compounding health disparities, with serious consequences for underrepresented groups and for the nation.</p>
<p>At the request of Congress, Improving Representation in Clinical Trials and Research: Building Research Equity for Women and Underrepresented Groups identifies policies, procedures, programs, or projects aimed at increasing the inclusion of these groups in clinical research and the specific strategies used by those conducting clinical trials and clinical and translational research to improve diversity and inclusion. This report models the potential economic benefits of full inclusion of men, women, and racial and ethnic groups in clinical research and highlights new programs and interventions in medical centers and other clinical settings designed to increase participation.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26479">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2021</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26628"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2022:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26628#final</id>
    <published>2022-06-29T10:45:01-04:00</published>
    <updated>2022-06-29T10:45:06-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2021.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26628">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2020</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26227"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2021:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26227#final</id>
    <published>2021-06-24T09:45:01-04:00</published>
    <updated>2021-06-24T11:00:29-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences(NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from government and other sponsors to pay for the large number of studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Research Council (NRC), and a much smaller sum that we withdraw from our own endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council.</p>
<p>This last year presented many challenges for the institution, as the COVID-19 pandemic began to effect operations in March 2020. At that time, the NAS/NRC decided to move to remote work for all staff and virtual meetings for committee and other convening activities. The move to virtual activity has been more successful than envisioned, with each part of the institution being able to operate surprisingly efficiently and effectively in such an environment. During the period from March through December 2020, the institution held hundreds of virtual webinars, workshops, lectures, and symposia, some with attendance into the thousands. The NRC released approximately 200 consensus studies, proceedings, and other publications during this period.</p>
<p>This Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2020.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26227">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Impact of COVID-19 on the Careers of Women in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26061"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2021:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26061#final</id>
    <published>2021-05-20T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2021-05-20T08:05:58-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The spring of 2020 marked a change in how almost everyone conducted their personal and professional lives, both within science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) and beyond. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted global scientific conferences and individual laboratories and required people to find space in their homes from which to work. It blurred the boundaries between work and non-work, infusing ambiguity into everyday activities. While adaptations that allowed people to connect became more common, the evidence available at the end of 2020 suggests that the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic endangered the engagement, experience, and retention of women in academic STEMM, and may roll back some of the achievement gains made by women in the academy to date.</p>
<p><i>The Impact of COVID-19 on the Careers of Women in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine</i> identifies, names, and documents how the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the careers of women in academic STEMM during the initial 9-month period since March 2020 and considers how these disruptions - both positive and negative - might shape future progress for women. This publication builds on the 2020 report <i>Promising Practices for Addressing the Underrepresentation of Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine</i> to develop a comprehensive understanding of the nuanced ways these disruptions have manifested. <i>The Impact of COVID-19 on the Careers of Women in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine</i> will inform the academic community as it emerges from the pandemic to mitigate any long-term negative consequences for the continued advancement of women in the academic STEMM workforce and build on the adaptations and opportunities that have emerged.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26061">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Endless Frontier The Next 75 Years in Science</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25990"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2020:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25990#final</id>
    <published>2020-12-17T10:46:20-05:00</published>
    <updated>2020-12-17T10:46:26-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The National Academy of Sciences hosted a symposium on February 26, 2020, that gathered top business, academic, and government leaders to explore whether the modern research architecture that fuels U.S. innovation needs to be reconfigured to meet the challenges of our time. The event was held in partnership with The Kavli Foundation and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation to mark the 75th anniversary of the publication of Vannevar Bush's seminal report <i>Science, the Endless Frontier</i>, which created a blueprint for U.S. scientific research in the post-World War II era. Bush's report empowered government support for innovation and basic research at the nation's universities and the policies that ultimately drove U.S. prosperity, health, and national security. This publication summarizes the presentations and discussion at the symposium focused on the future of pathways to leadership in science, how to respond to changes in the research enterprise, science and the public, the evolution of the government-university partnership, and connecting basic research with economic growth in the decades to come.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25990">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2019</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25854"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2020:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25854#final</id>
    <published>2020-06-29T13:46:03-04:00</published>
    <updated>2020-06-29T13:46:10-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>

<p>This <i>Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences</i> presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2019. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25854">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Promising Practices for Addressing the Underrepresentation of Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine Opening Doors</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25585"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2020:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25585#final</id>
    <published>2020-03-19T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2020-04-02T11:46:57-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Careers in science, engineering, and medicine offer opportunities to advance knowledge, contribute to the well-being of communities, and support the security, prosperity, and health of the United States. But many women do not pursue or persist in these careers, or advance to leadership positions - not because they lack the talent or aspirations, but because they face barriers, including: implicit and explicit bias; sexual harassment; unequal access to funding and resources; pay inequity; higher teaching and advising loads; and fewer speaking invitations, among others.</p>
<p>There are consequences from this underrepresentation of women for the nation as well: a labor shortage in many science, engineering, and medical professions that cannot be filled unless institutions and organizations recruit from a broad and diverse talent pool; lost opportunities for innovation and economic gain; and lost talent as a result of discrimination, unconscious bias, and sexual harassment.</p>
<p><i>Promising Practices for Addressing the Underrepresentation of Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine</i> reviews and synthesizes existing research on policies, practices, programs, and other interventions for improving the recruitment, retention, and sustained advancement into leadership roles of women in these disciplines. This report makes actionable recommendations to leverage change and drive swift, coordinated improvements to the systems of education, research, and employment in order to improve both the representation and leadership of women.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25585">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Integrity in Scientific Research Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10430"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2020:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10430#final</id>
    <published>2020-01-27T07:45:47-05:00</published>
    <updated>2020-01-27T07:46:15-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>"Most people say that it is the intellect which makes a great scientist. They are wrong: it is character." —Albert Einstein<br />
<br />
<i>Integrity in Scientific Research</i> attempts to define and describe those elements that encourage individuals involved with scientific research to act with integrity.<br />
<br />
Recognizing the inconsistency of human behavior, it stresses the important role that research institutions play in providing an integrity—rich environment, citing the need for institutions to provide staff with training and education, policies and procedures, and tools and support systems. It identifies practices that characterize integrity in such areas as peer review and research on human subjects and weighs the strengths and limitations of self—evaluation efforts by these institutions. In addition, it details an approach to promoting integrity during the education of researchers, including how to develop an effective curriculum. Providing a framework for research and educational institutions, this important book will be essential for anyone concerned about ethics in the scientific community.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10430">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/348'>Higher Education</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reproducibility and Replicability in Science</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25303"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2019:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25303#final</id>
    <published>2019-09-20T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2019-12-20T14:55:37-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>One of the pathways by which the scientific community confirms the validity of a new scientific discovery is by repeating the research that produced it. When a scientific effort fails to independently confirm the computations or results of a previous study, some fear that it may be a symptom of a lack of rigor in science, while others argue that such an observed inconsistency can be an important precursor to new discovery.</p>
<p>Concerns about reproducibility and replicability have been expressed in both scientific and popular media. As these concerns came to light, Congress requested that the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine conduct a study to assess the extent of issues related to reproducibility and replicability and to offer recommendations for improving rigor and transparency in scientific research.</p>
<p><i>Reproducibility and Replicability in Science</i> defines reproducibility and replicability and examines the factors that may lead to non-reproducibility and non-replicability in research. Unlike the typical expectation of reproducibility between two computations, expectations about replicability are more nuanced, and in some cases a lack of replicability can aid the process of scientific discovery. This report provides recommendations to researchers, academic institutions, journals, and funders on steps they can take to improve reproducibility and replicability in science.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25303">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/478'>Surveys and Statistics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/478'>Surveys and Statistics</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2018</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25503"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2019:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25503#final</id>
    <published>2019-07-02T10:45:23-04:00</published>
    <updated>2019-07-02T10:45:27-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>

<p>This Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2018. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25503">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Minority Serving Institutions America's Underutilized Resource for Strengthening the STEM Workforce</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25257"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2019:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25257#final</id>
    <published>2019-02-05T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2019-02-05T14:18:19-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>There are over 20 million young people of color in the United States whose representation in STEM education pathways and in the STEM workforce is still far below their numbers in the general population. Their participation could help re-establish the United States' preeminence in STEM innovation and productivity, while also increasing the number of well-educated STEM workers.</p> 

<p>There are nearly 700 minority-serving institutions (MSIs) that provide pathways to STEM educational success and workforce readiness for millions of students of color—and do so in a mission-driven and intentional manner. They vary substantially in their origins, missions, student demographics, and levels of institutional selectivity. But in general, their service to the nation provides a gateway to higher education and the workforce, particularly for underrepresented students of color and those from low-income and first-generation to college backgrounds. The challenge for the nation is how to capitalize on the unique strengths and attributes of these institutions and to equip them with the resources, exceptional faculty talent, and vital infrastructure needed to educate and train an increasingly critical portion of current and future generations of scientists, engineers, and health professionals.</p> 

<p><i>Minority Serving Institutions</i> examines the nation's MSIs and identifies promising programs and effective strategies that have the highest potential return on investment for the nation by increasing the quantity and quality MSI STEM graduates. This study also provides critical information and perspective about the importance of MSIs to other stakeholders in the nation's system of higher education and the organizations that support them.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25257">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/348'>Higher Education</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/350'>Math and Science Education</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/407'>Workforce and Labor Issues</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/347'>Engineering Education</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/351'>Medical Training and Workforce</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Open Science by Design Realizing a Vision for 21st Century Research</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25116"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2018:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25116#final</id>
    <published>2018-08-09T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2018-08-09T13:56:04-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Openness and sharing of information are fundamental to the progress of science and to the effective functioning of the research enterprise. The advent of scientific journals in the 17th century helped power the Scientific Revolution by allowing researchers to communicate across time and space, using the technologies of that era to generate reliable knowledge more quickly and efficiently. Harnessing today's stunning, ongoing advances in information technologies, the global research enterprise and its stakeholders are moving toward a new open science ecosystem. Open science aims to ensure the free availability and usability of scholarly publications, the data that result from scholarly research, and the methodologies, including code or algorithms, that were used to generate those data.</p>

<p><i>Open Science by Design</i> is aimed at overcoming barriers and moving toward open science as the default approach across the research enterprise. This report explores specific examples of open science and discusses a range of challenges, focusing on stakeholder perspectives. It is meant to provide guidance to the research enterprise and its stakeholders as they build strategies for achieving open science and take the next steps.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25116">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sexual Harassment of Women Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24994"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2018:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24994#final</id>
    <published>2018-08-01T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2018-08-01T12:19:43-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Over the last few decades, research, activity, and funding has been devoted to improving the recruitment, retention, and advancement of women in the fields of science, engineering, and medicine. In recent years the diversity of those participating in these fields, particularly the participation of women, has improved and there are significantly more women entering careers and studying science, engineering, and medicine than ever before. However, as women increasingly enter these fields they face biases and barriers and it is not surprising that sexual harassment is one of these barriers.</p>
<p>Over thirty years the incidence of sexual harassment in different industries has held steady, yet now more women are in the workforce and in academia, and in the fields of science, engineering, and medicine (as students and faculty) and so more women are experiencing sexual harassment as they work and learn. Over the last several years, revelations of the sexual harassment experienced by women in the workplace and in academic settings have raised urgent questions about the specific impact of this discriminatory behavior on women and the extent to which it is limiting their careers.</p>
<p><em>Sexual Harassment of Women</em> explores the influence of sexual harassment in academia on the career advancement of women in the scientific, technical, and medical workforce. This report reviews the research on the extent to which women in the fields of science, engineering, and medicine are victimized by sexual harassment and examines the existing information on the extent to which sexual harassment in academia negatively impacts the recruitment, retention, and advancement of women pursuing scientific, engineering, technical, and medical careers. It also identifies and analyzes the policies, strategies and practices that have been the most successful in preventing and addressing sexual harassment in these settings.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24994">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/309'>Women and Minorities</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2017</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25177"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2018:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25177#final</id>
    <published>2018-07-06T10:20:26-04:00</published>
    <updated>2018-07-06T10:55:03-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>
<p>This <i>Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences</i> presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2017. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25177">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Fostering Integrity in Research</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21896"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2017:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21896#final</id>
    <published>2017-12-13T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2017-12-15T09:25:52-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The integrity of knowledge that emerges from research is based on individual and collective adherence to core values of objectivity, honesty, openness, fairness, accountability, and stewardship. Integrity in science means that the organizations in which research is conducted encourage those involved to exemplify these values in every step of the research process. Understanding the dynamics that support – or distort – practices that uphold the integrity of research by all participants ensures that the research enterprise advances knowledge.</p>
<p>The 1992 report <i>Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process</i> evaluated issues related to scientific responsibility and the conduct of research. It provided a valuable service in describing and analyzing a very complicated set of issues, and has served as a crucial basis for thinking about research integrity for more than two decades. However, as experience has accumulated with various forms of research misconduct, detrimental research practices, and other forms of misconduct, as subsequent empirical research has revealed more about the nature of scientific misconduct, and because technological and social changes have altered the environment in which science is conducted, it is clear that the framework established more than two decades ago needs to be updated.</p>
<p><i>Responsible Science</i> served as a valuable benchmark to set the context for this most recent analysis and to help guide the committee's thought process. <i>Fostering Integrity in Research</i> identifies best practices in research and recommends practical options for discouraging and addressing research misconduct and detrimental research practices.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21896">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>An Assessment of ARPA-E Summary</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24811"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2017:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24811#final</id>
    <published>2017-08-03T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2017-08-03T11:30:23-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>In 2005, the National Research Council report <i>Rising Above the Gathering Storm</i> recommended a new way for the federal government to spur technological breakthroughs in the energy sector. It recommended the creation of a new agency, the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, or ARPA-E, as an adaptation of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) model—widely considered a successful experiment that has funded out-of-the-box, transformative research and engineering that made possible the Internet, GPS, and stealth aircraft. This new agency was envisioned as a means of tackling the nation's energy challenges in a way that could translate basic research into technological breakthroughs while also addressing economic, environmental, and security issues.</p> 

<p>Congress authorized ARPA-E in the 2007 America COMPETES Act and requested an early assessment following 6 years of operation to examine the agency's progress toward achieving its statutory mission and goals. This publication summarizes the results of that assessment.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24811">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2016</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24826"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2017:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24826#final</id>
    <published>2017-06-29T13:58:30-04:00</published>
    <updated>2017-07-12T13:36:10-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>

<p>This <i>Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences</i> presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2016. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24826">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Communicating Science Effectively A Research Agenda</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23674"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2017:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23674#final</id>
    <published>2017-03-08T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2017-04-13T15:56:48-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Science and technology are embedded in virtually every aspect of modern life. As a result, people face an increasing need to integrate information from science with their personal values and other considerations as they make important life decisions about medical care, the safety of foods, what to do about climate change, and many other issues. Communicating science effectively, however, is a complex task and an acquired skill. Moreover, the approaches to communicating science that will be most effective for specific audiences and circumstances are not obvious. Fortunately, there is an expanding science base from diverse disciplines that can support science communicators in making these determinations.</p>
<p><i>Communicating Science Effectively</i> offers a research agenda for science communicators and researchers seeking to apply this research and fill gaps in knowledge about how to communicate effectively about science, focusing in particular on issues that are contentious in the public sphere. To inform this research agenda, this publication identifies important influences – psychological, economic, political, social, cultural, and media-related – on how science related to such issues is understood, perceived, and used.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23674">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Optimizing the Nation's Investment in Academic Research A New Regulatory Framework for the 21st Century</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21824"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2016:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21824#final</id>
    <published>2016-06-29T12:19:43-04:00</published>
    <updated>2016-07-13T16:28:00-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Research universities are critical contributors to our national research enterprise. They are the principal source of a world-class labor force and fundamental discoveries that enhance our lives and the lives of others around the world. These institutions help to create an educated citizenry capable of making informed and crucial choices as participants in a democratic society. However many are concerned that the unintended cumulative effect of federal regulations undercuts the productivity of the research enterprise and diminishes the return on the federal investment in research.</p>
<p><i>Optimizing the Nation's Investment in Academic Research</i> reviews the regulatory framework as it currently exists, considers specific regulations that have placed undue and often unanticipated burdens on the research enterprise, and reassesses the process by which these regulations are created, reviewed, and retired. This review is critical to strengthen the partnership between the federal government and research institutions, to maximize the creation of new knowledge and products, to provide for the effective training and education of the next generation of scholars and workers, and to optimize the return on the federal investment in research for the benefit of the American people.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21824">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/348'>Higher Education</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2015</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23558"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2016:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23558#final</id>
    <published>2016-06-27T08:10:29-04:00</published>
    <updated>2016-06-27T08:10:52-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>
<p>This <i>Report of the Treasure of the National Academy of Sciences</i> presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2015. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23558">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Committee on Proposal Evaluation for Allocation of Supercomputing Time for the Study of Molecular Dynamics Sixth Round</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21817"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2015:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21817#final</id>
    <published>2015-11-16T11:14:27-05:00</published>
    <updated>2015-11-16T11:14:33-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This report describes the work of the Committee on Proposal Evaluation for Allocation of Supercomputing Time for the Study of Molecular Dynamics, Sixth Round. The committee evaluated submissions received in response to a Request for Proposals (RFP) for biomolecular simulation time on Anton, a supercomputer specially designed and built by D.E. Shaw Research (DESRES). Over the past five years, DESRES has made an Anton system housed at the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center (PSC) available to the non-commercial research community, based on the advice of previous National Research Council committees. As in prior rounds, the goal of the sixth RFP for simulation time on Anton is to continue to facilitate breakthrough research in the study of biomolecular systems by providing a massively parallel system specially designed for molecular dynamics simulations. The program seeks to continue to support research that addresses important and high impact questions demonstrating a clear need for Anton's special capabilities.</p>
<p><i>Report of the Committee on Proposal Evaluation for Allocation of Supercomputing Time for the Study of Molecular Dynamics, Sixth Round</i> is the report of the committee's evaluation of proposals based on scientific merit, justification for requested time allocation, and investigator qualifications and past accomplishments. This report identifies the proposals that best met the selection criteria.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21817">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/19007"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2015:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/19007#final</id>
    <published>2015-07-15T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2016-04-04T11:34:53-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The past half-century has witnessed a dramatic increase in the scale and complexity of scientific research. The growing scale of science has been accompanied by a shift toward collaborative research, referred to as "team science." Scientific research is increasingly conducted by small teams and larger groups rather than individual investigators, but the challenges of collaboration can slow these teams' progress in achieving their scientific goals. How does a team-based approach work, and how can universities and research institutions support teams?</p>
<p><i>Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science</i> synthesizes and integrates the available research to provide guidance on assembling the science team; leadership, education and professional development for science teams and groups. It also examines institutional and organizational structures and policies to support science teams and identifies areas where further research is needed to help science teams and groups achieve their scientific and translational goals. This report offers major public policy recommendations for science research agencies and policymakers, as well as recommendations for individual scientists, disciplinary associations, and research universities. <i>Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science</i> will be of interest to university research administrators, team science leaders, science faculty, and graduate and postdoctoral students.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/19007">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/404'>Human Systems and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/348'>Higher Education</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2014</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21779"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2015:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21779#final</id>
    <published>2015-07-09T15:46:21-04:00</published>
    <updated>2015-07-09T15:46:36-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>
<p>This <i>Report of the Treasure of the National Academy of Sciences</i> presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2014. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors.</p>
        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21779">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Postdoctoral Experience Revisited</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18982"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2014:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18982#final</id>
    <published>2014-12-10T10:45:01-05:00</published>
    <updated>2014-12-10T10:45:42-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p><i>The Postdoctoral Experience Revisited</i> builds on the 2000 report <i>Enhancing the Postdoctoral Experience for Scientists and Engineers</i>. That ground-breaking report assessed the postdoctoral experience and provided principles, action points, and recommendations to enhance that experience. Since the publication of the 2000 report, the postdoctoral landscape has changed considerably. The percentage of PhDs who pursue postdoctoral training is growing steadily and spreading from the biomedical and physical sciences to engineering and the social sciences. The average length of time spent in postdoctoral positions seems to be increasing. <i>The Postdoctoral Experience Revisited</i> reexamines postdoctoral programs in the United States, focusing on how postdocs are being guided and managed, how institutional practices have changed, and what happens to postdocs after they complete their programs. This book explores important changes that have occurred in postdoctoral practices and the research ecosystem and assesses how well current practices meet the needs of these fledgling scientists and engineers and of the research enterprise.</p>
<p><i>The Postdoctoral Experience Revisited</i> takes a fresh look at current postdoctoral fellows - how many there are, where they are working, in what fields, and for how many years. This book makes recommendations to improve aspects of programs - postdoctoral period of service, title and role, career development, compensation and benefits, and mentoring. Current data on demographics, career aspirations, and career outcomes for postdocs are limited. This report makes the case for better data collection by research institution and data sharing.</p>
<p>A larger goal of this study is not only to propose ways to make the postdoctoral system better for the postdoctoral researchers themselves but also to better understand the role that postdoctoral training plays in the research enterprise. It is also to ask whether there are alternative ways to satisfy some of the research and career development needs of postdoctoral researchers that are now being met with several years of advanced training. Postdoctoral researchers are the future of the research enterprise. The discussion and recommendations of <i>The Postdoctoral Experience Revisited</i> will stimulate action toward clarifying the role of postdoctoral researchers and improving their status and experience.</p>         <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18982">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Furthering America's Research Enterprise</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18804"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2014:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18804#final</id>
    <published>2014-10-28T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2014-10-29T08:47:07-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Scientific research has enabled America to remain at the forefront of global competition for commercially viable technologies and other innovations. For more than 65 years, the United States has led the world in science and technology. Discoveries from scientific research have extended our understanding of the physical and natural world, the cosmos, society, and of humans - their minds, bodies, and economic and other social interactions. Through these discoveries, science has enabled longer and healthier lives, provided for a better-educated citizenry, enhanced the national economy, and strengthened America's position in the global economy. At a time of budget stringency, how can we foster scientific innovation to ensure America's unprecedented prosperity, security, and quality of life?</p>
<p>Although many studies have investigated the impacts of research on society, <i>Furthering America's Research Enterprise</i> brings to bear a fresh approach informed by a more holistic understanding of the research enterprise as a complex, dynamic system. This understanding illuminates why America's research enterprise has historically been so successful; where attention should be focused to increase the societal benefits of research investments; and how those who make decisions on the allocation of funds for scientific research can best carry out their task.</p>
<p>This report will be of special interest to policy makers who support or manage the research enterprise, to others in public and private institutions who fund research, to scholars of the research enterprise, and to scientists and engineers who seek to better understand the many pathways through which their research benefits society.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18804">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Safe Science Promoting a Culture of Safety in Academic Chemical Research</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18706"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2014:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18706#final</id>
    <published>2014-10-08T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2014-10-08T17:31:00-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Recent serious and sometimes fatal accidents in chemical research laboratories at United States universities have driven government agencies, professional societies, industries, and universities themselves to examine the culture of safety in research laboratories. These incidents have triggered a broader discussion of how serious incidents can be prevented in the future and how best to train researchers and emergency personnel to respond appropriately when incidents do occur. As the priority placed on safety increases, many institutions have expressed a desire to go beyond simple compliance with regulations to work toward fostering a strong, positive safety culture: affirming a constant commitment to safety throughout their institutions, while integrating safety as an essential element in the daily work of laboratory researchers.</p>
<p><i>Safe Science</i> takes on this challenge. This report examines the culture of safety in research institutions and makes recommendations for university leadership, laboratory researchers, and environmental health and safety professionals to support safety as a core value of their institutions. The report discusses ways to fulfill that commitment through prioritizing funding for safety equipment and training, as well as making safety an ongoing operational priority.</p>
<p>A strong, positive safety culture arises not because of a set of rules but because of a constant commitment to safety throughout an organization. Such a culture supports the free exchange of safety information, emphasizes learning and improvement, and assigns greater importance to solving problems than to placing blame. High importance is assigned to safety at all times, not just when it is convenient or does not threaten personal or institutional productivity goals. <i>Safe Science</i> will be a guide to make the changes needed at all levels to protect students, researchers, and staff.</p>         <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18706">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/290'>Math, Chemistry, and Physics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/409'>Chemistry</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/472'>Biosecurity</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2013</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18830"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2014:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18830#final</id>
    <published>2014-07-01T11:11:25-04:00</published>
    <updated>2014-07-01T11:11:34-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Research Council (NRC), and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>
<p>This Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2013. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18830">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Convergence Facilitating Transdisciplinary Integration of Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, Engineering, and Beyond</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18722"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2014:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18722#final</id>
    <published>2014-06-16T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2014-06-17T10:52:54-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p><em>Convergence</em> discusses details of current programs in convergence of the life sciences with other STEM fields, how organizations have chosen to measure success, and what has worked and not worked in varied settings.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18722">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Trends in the Innovation Ecosystem Can Past Successes Help Inform Future Strategies? Summary of Two Workshops</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18509"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2013:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18509#final</id>
    <published>2013-09-10T10:54:44-04:00</published>
    <updated>2016-06-30T16:22:46-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Innovation has been a major engine of American economic and societal progress. It has increased per capita income more than sevenfold since the 19th century, has added three decades to the average lifespan, has revolutionized the way we communicate and share information, and has made the United States the strongest military power in the world. Without its historical leadership in innovation, the United States would be a very different country than it is today.</p>
<p><i>Trends in the Innovation Ecosystem</i> is the summary of two workshops hosted by the Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP) of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine in February and May, 2013. Experts from industry, academia, and finance met to discuss the challenges involved in innovation pathways. Both workshops focused on the interactions between research universities and industry and the concept of innovation as a "culture" as opposed to an operational method. The goal was to gain a better understanding of what key factors contributed to successful innovations in the past, how today's environment might necessitate changes in strategy, and what changes are likely to occur in the future in the context of a global innovation ecosystem. This report discusses the state of innovation in America, obstacles to both innovation and to reaping the benefits of innovation, and ways of overcoming those obstacles.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18509">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/284'>Engineering and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/365'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2012</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18388"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2013:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18388#final</id>
    <published>2013-07-02T11:21:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2013-07-02T11:25:01-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p> The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Research Council (NRC), and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>
<p>This Report of the Treasure of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2012. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18388">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Disaster Resilience A National Imperative</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13457"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2012:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13457#final</id>
    <published>2012-11-29T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2017-04-21T16:01:59-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>No person or place is immune from disasters or disaster-related losses. Infectious disease outbreaks, acts of terrorism, social unrest, or financial disasters in addition to natural hazards can all lead to large-scale consequences for the nation and its communities. Communities and the nation thus face difficult fiscal, social, cultural, and environmental choices about the best ways to ensure basic security and quality of life against hazards, deliberate attacks, and disasters. Beyond the unquantifiable costs of injury and loss of life from disasters, statistics for 2011 alone indicate economic damages from natural disasters in the United States exceeded $55 billion, with 14 events costing more than a billion dollars in damages each.</p>
<p>One way to reduce the impacts of disasters on the nation and its communities is to invest in enhancing resilience—the ability to prepare and plan for, absorb, recover from and more successfully adapt to adverse events. <i>Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative</i> addresses the broad issue of increasing the nation's resilience to disasters. This book defines "national resilience", describes the state of knowledge about resilience to hazards and disasters, and frames the main issues related to increasing resilience in the United States. It also provide goals, baseline conditions, or performance metrics for national resilience and outlines additional information, data, gaps, and/or obstacles that need to be addressed to increase the nation's resilience to disasters. Additionally, the book's authoring committee makes recommendations about the necessary approaches to elevate national resilience to disasters in the United States.</p>
<p>Enhanced resilience allows better anticipation of disasters and better planning to reduce disaster losses-rather than waiting for an event to occur and paying for it afterward. <i>Disaster Resilience</i> confronts the topic of how to increase the nation's resilience to disasters through a vision of the characteristics of a resilient nation in the year 2030. Increasing disaster resilience is an imperative that requires the collective will of the nation and its communities. Although disasters will continue to occur, actions that move the nation from reactive approaches to disasters to a proactive stance where communities actively engage in enhancing resilience will reduce many of the broad societal and economic burdens that disasters can cause.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13457">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/281'>Earth Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/332'>Earthquakes, Floods and Natural Disasters</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/470'>Disaster Response</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Science for Environmental Protection The Road Ahead</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13510"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2012:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13510#final</id>
    <published>2012-11-21T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2023-03-20T14:16:10-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>In anticipation of future environmental science and engineering challenges and technologic advances, EPA asked the National Research Council (NRC) to assess the overall capabilities of the agency to develop, obtain, and use the best available scientific and technologic information and tools to meet persistent, emerging, and future mission challenges and opportunities. Although the committee cannot predict with certainty what new environmental problems EPA will face in the next 10 years or more, it worked to identify some of the common drivers and common characteristics of problems that are likely to occur.</p>
<p>Tensions inherent to the structure of EPA's work contribute to the current and persistent challenges faced by the agency, and meeting those challenges will require development of leading-edge scientific methods, tools, and technologies, and a more deliberate approach to systems thinking and interdisciplinary science. <em>Science for Environmental Protection: The Road Ahead</em> outlines a framework for building science for environmental protection in the 21st century and identified key areas where enhanced leadership and capacity can strengthen the agency's abilities to address current and emerging environmental challenges as well as take advantage of new tools and technologies to address them. The foundation of EPA science is strong, but the agency needs to continue to address numerous present and future challenges if it is to maintain its science leadership and meet its expanding mandates.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13510">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/285'>Environment and Environmental Studies</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/371'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/281'>Earth Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/337'>Natural Resources and Conservation</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/285'>Environment and Environmental Studies</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/372'>Pollutants and Toxics</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Review of the US/USSR Agreement on Cooperation in the Fields of Science and Technology</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13528"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2012:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13528#final</id>
    <published>2012-09-25T13:31:18-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-09-25T14:40:19-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>May 24, 1977, marks the expiration date or the five-year U.S./U.S.S.R. Agreement on Cooperation in the Fields of Science and Technology (S&T). This study is the response of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) to a March 28, 1977, request by Dr. Frank Press, President Carter's Science Adviser and Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTOP), for assistance in evaluating the benefits from this Agreement and in establishing the form of the renewal. <em>Review of the US/USSR Agreement on Cooperation in the Fields of Science and Technology </em>examines this study.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13528">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2011</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13445"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2012:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13445#final</id>
    <published>2012-07-11T10:52:33-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-07-11T10:54:25-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p> The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Research Council (NRC), and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>
<p>This Report of the Treasure of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2011. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13445">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A View of Global S&amp;T Based on Activities of the Board on Global Science and Technology Letter Report</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13309"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2011:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13309#final</id>
    <published>2011-12-07T10:45:01-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-12-07T12:15:59-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This letter report describes the 2009-2011 activities of the Board on Global Science and Technology (BGST) and provides an initial characterization of the global science and technology landscape that the Board can use as a roadmap to develop future activities. BGST met five times between November 2009 and May 2011. Board meetings were devoted to (1) identifying national security implications of the globalization of S&T, (2) building a baseline understanding of current indicators for the U.S. posture with regard to the evolving global S&T landscape, and (3) developing a BGST engagement strategy. The letter portion of the report summarizes activities of the board in its first year, and also describes some existing approaches to identifying and/or benchmarking emerging technologies globally. It is followed by 5 appendixes which include three experimental examples of a qualitative approach to benchmarking, and brief descriptions of programs that are part of the National Academies complex, with which BGST has cooperated.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13309">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/290'>Math, Chemistry, and Physics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/409'>Chemistry</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence Third Edition</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13163"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2011:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13163#final</id>
    <published>2011-09-28T09:45:42-04:00</published>
    <updated>2017-04-07T12:25:04-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p><i>The Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, Third Edition</i>, assists judges in managing cases involving complex scientific and technical evidence by describing the basic tenets of key scientific fields from which legal evidence is typically derived and by providing examples of cases in which that evidence has been used.</p>
<p>First published in 1994 by the Federal Judicial Center, the <i>Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence</i> has been relied upon in the legal and academic communities and is often cited by various courts and others. Judges faced with disputes over the admissibility of scientific and technical evidence refer to the manual to help them better understand and evaluate the relevance, reliability and usefulness of the evidence being proffered. The manual is not intended to tell judges what is good science and what is not. Instead, it serves to help judges identify issues on which experts are likely to differ and to guide the inquiry of the court in seeking an informed resolution of the conflict.</p>
<p>The core of the manual consists of a series of chapters (reference guides) on various scientific topics, each authored by an expert in that field. The topics have been chosen by an oversight committee because of their complexity and frequency in litigation. Each chapter is intended to provide a general overview of the topic in lay terms, identifying issues that will be useful to judges and others in the legal profession. They are written for a non-technical audience and are not intended as exhaustive presentations of the topic. Rather, the chapters seek to provide judges with the basic information in an area of science, to allow them to have an informed conversation with the experts and attorneys.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13163">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/278'>Biology and Life Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/315'>Genetics</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/306'>Law and Justice</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation America's Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12984"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2011:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12984#final</id>
    <published>2011-06-29T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-07-01T13:22:26-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>In order for the United States to maintain the global leadership and competitiveness in science and technology that are critical to achieving national goals, we must invest in research, encourage innovation, and grow a strong and talented science and technology workforce. <em>Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation </em>explores the role of diversity in the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) workforce and its value in keeping America innovative and competitive. According to the book, the U.S. labor market is projected to grow faster in science and engineering than in any other sector in the coming years, making minority participation in STEM education at all levels a national priority.</p>
<p><em>Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation </em>analyzes the rate of change and the challenges the nation currently faces in developing a strong and diverse workforce. Although minorities are the fastest growing segment of the population, they are underrepresented in the fields of science and engineering. Historically, there has been a strong connection between increasing educational attainment in the United States and the growth in and global leadership of the economy. Expanding <em>Underrepresented Minority Participation </em>suggests that the federal government, industry, and post-secondary institutions work collaboratively with K-12 schools and school systems to increase minority access to and demand for post-secondary STEM education and technical training.</p>
<p>The book also identifies best practices and offers a comprehensive road map for increasing involvement of underrepresented minorities and improving the quality of their education. It offers recommendations that focus on academic and social support, institutional roles, teacher preparation, affordability and program development.</p>
<p><br />
 </p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12984">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/350'>Math and Science Education</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/284'>Engineering and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/362'>Engineering Education</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/290'>Math, Chemistry, and Physics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/412'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/407'>Workforce and Labor Issues</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/347'>Engineering Education</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2010</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13190"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2011:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13190#final</id>
    <published>2011-06-23T16:01:26-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-23T16:01:35-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Research Council (NRC), and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>
<p>This Report of the Treasure of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2010. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13190">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rising Above the Gathering Storm Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11463"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2011:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11463#final</id>
    <published>2011-05-09T11:53:25-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-05-12T16:52:38-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        In a world where advanced knowledge is widespread and low-cost labor is readily available, U.S. advantages in the marketplace and in science and technology have begun to erode. A comprehensive and coordinated federal effort is urgently needed to bolster U.S. competitiveness and pre-eminence in these areas. This congressionally requested report by a pre-eminent committee makes four recommendations along with 20 implementation actions that federal policy-makers should take to create high-quality jobs and focus new science and technology efforts on meeting the nation's needs, especially in the area of clean, affordable energy:
<br><br>
1) Increase America's talent pool by vastly improving K-12 mathematics and science education; 
<br>
2) Sustain and strengthen the nation's commitment to long-term basic research;
<br>
3) Develop, recruit, and retain top students, scientists, and engineers from both the U.S. and abroad; and
<br>
4) Ensure that the United States is the premier place in the world for innovation. 
<br>
<br>
Some actions will involve changing existing laws, while others will require financial support that would come from reallocating existing budgets or increasing them. <i>Rising Above the Gathering Storm</i> will be of great interest to federal and state government agencies, educators and schools, public decision makers, research sponsors, regulatory analysts, and scholars.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11463">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/304'>Economics</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/352'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/284'>Engineering and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/365'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/407'>Workforce and Labor Issues</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited Rapidly Approaching Category 5: Condensed Version</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13151"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2011:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13151#final</id>
    <published>2011-04-18T14:08:32-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-04-18T14:08:37-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>In 2005 the National Academies<span style="font-style: italic;"> </span>released <em>Rising Above the Gathering Storm</em>, a book focused on the ability of all Americans to compete for quality jobs in the evolving global economy. <em>Rising Above the Gathering Storm</em> concluded that a primary driver of the future economy and concomitant creation of jobs in the 21st century will be innovation, largely derived from advances in science and engineering. It proposed four overarching recommendations, underpinned by 20 specific implementing actions. The America COMPETES Act approved many of the recommendations set forth in <em>Rising Above the Gathering Storm</em>. </p>
<p>In 2010, the National Academies released <em>Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited</em>, an updated volume that outlines the work of the government and the private sector in the past five years. This volume also presents a series of thought-provoking factoids about the state of science and innovation in America. It asserts that the 20 actions previously endorsed should be fully implemented. </p>
<p>This report is a condensed version of <em>Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited</em>.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13151">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/'></a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/'></a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/284'>Engineering and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/'></a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Global Technology Changes and Implications: Summary of a Forum</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13073"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2011:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13073#final</id>
    <published>2011-01-25T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-01-25T17:18:45-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Engineers know what they mean by the word <em>technology</em>. They mean the things engineers conceive, design, build, and deploy. But what does the word <em>global </em>in the phrase <em>global technology</em> mean? Does it mean finding a way to feed, clothe, house, and otherwise serve the 9 billion people who will soon live on the planet? Does it mean competing with companies around the world to build and sell products and services? On a more immediate and practical level, can the rise of global technology be expected to create or destroy U.S. jobs?</p>
<p>The National Academy of Engineering held a three-hour forum exploring these and related questions. The forum brought together seven prominent members of the engineering community:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Esko Aho, Executive Vice President of Corporate Relations and Responsibility, Nokia; former Prime Minister of Finland</li>
    <li>Bernard Amadei, Founder, Engineers Without Borders, Professor, University of Colorado</li>
    <li>John Seely Brown, Visiting Professor, University of Southern California; Former Chief Scientist of Xerox Corporation</li>
    <li>Ruth A. David, President and CEO of Analytic Services, Inc.</li>
    <li>Eric C. Haseltine, Consultant, former Associate Director for Science and Technology in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and former head of research and development at Disney Imagineering</li>
    <li>Nicholas Negroponte, Founder, One Laptop Per Child Association Inc., Founder and Chairman Emeritus of the MIT Media Lab</li>
    <li>Raymond S. Stata, Co-founder and Chairman of the Board, Analog Devices Inc.</li>
</ul>
<p>In the first half of the forum, each panelist explored a specific dimension of the global spread of technology. The topics varied widely—from reducing poverty to the impact of young people on technology to the need for systems thinking in engineering. But all seven presenters foresaw a world in which engineering will be fundamentally different from what it has been. In the second half of the forum, the panelists discussed a variety of issues raised by moderator Charles Vest and by forum attendees.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13073">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/406'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited Rapidly Approaching Category 5</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12999"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2010:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12999#final</id>
    <published>2010-09-23T13:45:01-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-01-14T12:41:37-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>In the face of so many daunting near-term challenges, U.S. government and industry are letting the crucial strategic issues of U.S. competitiveness slip below the surface. Five years ago, the National Academies prepared <i>Rising Above the Gathering Storm</i>, a book that cautioned: "Without a renewed effort to bolster the foundations of our competitiveness, we can expect to lose our privileged position." Since that time we find ourselves in a country where much has changed—and a great deal has not changed.</p>
<p>So where <i>does</i> America stand relative to its position of five years ago when the <i>Gathering Storm</i> book was prepared? The unanimous view of the authors is that our nation's outlook has worsened. The present volume, <i>Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited</i>, explores the tipping point America now faces. Addressing America's competitiveness challenge will require many years if not decades; however, the requisite federal funding of much of that effort is about to terminate.</p>
<p><i>Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited</i> provides a snapshot of the work of the government and the private sector in the past five years, analyzing how the original recommendations have or have not been acted upon, what consequences this may have on future competitiveness, and priorities going forward. In addition, readers will find a series of thought- and discussion-provoking factoids—many of them alarming—about the state of science and innovation in America.</p>
<p><i>Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited</i> is a wake-up call. To reverse the foreboding outlook will require a sustained commitment by both individual citizens and government officials—at all levels. This book, together with the original <i>Gathering Storm</i> volume, provides the roadmap to meet that goal. While this book is essential for policy makers, anyone concerned with the future of innovation, competitiveness, and the standard of living in the United States will find this book an ideal tool for engaging their government representatives, peers, and community about this momentous issue.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12999">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/345'>Education Research and Theory</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/284'>Engineering and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/365'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/304'>Economics</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2009</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12936"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2010:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12936#final</id>
    <published>2010-06-16T16:30:39-04:00</published>
    <updated>2010-06-16T16:30:39-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This <em>Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences</em> presents the financial position and results of operations, as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments pool activities of the Academy for the year ended December 31, 2009.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12936">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Private-Public Sector Collaboration to Enhance Community Disaster Resilience A Workshop Report</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12864"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2010:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12864#final</id>
    <published>2010-02-23T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2010-02-22T09:45:01-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 (9/11) on the United States prompted a rethinking of how the United States prepares for disasters. Federal policy documents written since 9/11 have stressed that the private and public sectors share equal responsibility for the security of the nation's critical infrastructure and key assets. Private sector entities have a role in the safety, security, and resilience of the communities in which they operate. Incentivizing the private sector to expend resources on community efforts remains challenging. Disasters in the United States since 9/11 (e.g., Hurricane Katrina in 2005) indicate that the nation has not yet been successful in making its communities resilient to disaster.<br />
<br />
In this book, the National Research Council assesses the current states of the art and practice in private-public sector collaboration dedicated to strengthening community disaster resilience.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12864">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/281'>Earth Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/332'>Earthquakes, Floods and Natural Disasters</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/470'>Disaster Response</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ensuring the Integrity, Accessibility, and Stewardship of Research Data in the Digital Age</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12615"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2009:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12615#final</id>
    <published>2009-11-17T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-07-30T14:17:18-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>As digital technologies are expanding the power and reach of research, they are also raising complex issues. These include complications in ensuring the validity of research data; standards that do not keep pace with the high rate of innovation; restrictions on data sharing that reduce the ability of researchers to verify results and build on previous research; and huge increases in the amount of data being generated, creating severe challenges in preserving that data for long-term use.</p>
<p>Ensuring the Integrity, Accessibility, and Stewardship of Research Data in the Digital Age examines the consequences of the changes affecting research data with respect to three issues - integrity, accessibility, and stewardship-and finds a need for a new approach to the design and the management of research projects. The report recommends that all researchers receive appropriate training in the management of research data, and calls on researchers to make all research data, methods, and other information underlying results publicly accessible in a timely manner. The book also sees the stewardship of research data as a critical long-term task for the research enterprise and its stakeholders. Individual researchers, research institutions, research sponsors, professional societies, and journals involved in scientific, engineering, and medical research will find this book an essential guide to the principles affecting research data in the digital age.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12615">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/279'>Computers and Information Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/323'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/348'>Higher Education</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States A Path Forward</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12589"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2009:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12589#final</id>
    <published>2009-07-29T15:47:32-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-07-29T15:47:32-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Scores of talented and dedicated people serve the forensic science community, performing vitally important work. However, they are often constrained by lack of adequate resources, sound policies, and national support. It is clear that change and advancements, both systematic and scientific, are needed in a number of forensic science disciplines to ensure the reliability of work, establish enforceable standards, and promote best practices with consistent application. <em>Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward</em> provides a detailed plan for addressing these needs and suggests the creation of a new government entity, the National Institute of Forensic Science, to establish and enforce standards within the forensic science community.</p>
<p>The benefits of improving and regulating the forensic science disciplines are clear: assisting law enforcement officials, enhancing homeland security, and reducing the risk of wrongful conviction and exoneration. <em>Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States</em> gives a full account of what is needed to advance the forensic science disciplines, including upgrading of systems and organizational structures, better training, widespread adoption of uniform and enforceable best practices, and mandatory certification and accreditation programs.</p>
<p>While this book provides an essential call-to-action for congress and policy makers, it also serves as a vital tool for law enforcement agencies, criminal prosecutors and attorneys, and forensic science educators.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12589">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/306'>Law and Justice</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Survey of Attitudes and Actions on Dual Use Research in the Life Sciences A Collaborative Effort of the National Research Council and the American Association for the Advancement of Science</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12460"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2009:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12460#final</id>
    <published>2009-07-14T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-02-05T10:45:01-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The same technologies that fuel scientific advances also pose potential risks—that the knowledge, tools, and techniques gained through legitimate biotechnology research could be misused to create biological weapons or for bioterrorism. This is often called the dual use dilemma of the life sciences. Yet even research with the greatest potential for misuse may offer significant benefits. Determining how to constrain the danger without harming essential scientific research is critical for national security as well as prosperity and well-being.</p>
<p>This book discusses a 2007 survey of American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) members in the life sciences about their knowledge of dual use issues and attitudes about their responsibilities to help mitigate the risks of misuse of their research.</p>
<p>Overall, the results suggest that there may be considerable support for approaches to oversight that rely on measures that are developed and implemented by the scientific community itself. The responses also suggest that there is a need to clarify the scope of research activities of concern and to provide guidance about what actions scientists can take to reduce the risk that their research will be misused by those with malicious intent.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12460">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/278'>Biology and Life Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/317'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/327'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/328'>Prevention, Security and Response</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/472'>Biosecurity</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2008</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12686"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2009:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12686#final</id>
    <published>2009-06-16T15:46:33-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-06-16T15:46:33-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This <em>Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences</em> presents the financial position and results of operations, as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments pool activities of the Academy for the year ended December 31, 2008. </p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12686">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Beyond 'Fortress America' National Security Controls on Science and Technology in a Globalized World</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12567"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2009:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12567#final</id>
    <published>2009-04-30T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-01-08T13:45:01-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The national security controls that regulate access to and export of science and technology are broken. As currently structured, many of these controls undermine our national and homeland security and stifle American engagement in the global economy, and in science and technology. These unintended consequences arise from policies that were crafted for an earlier era. In the name of maintaining superiority, the U.S. now runs the risk of becoming less secure, less competitive and less prosperous. <br />
<br />
<em>Beyond "Fortress America"</em> provides an account of the costs associated with building walls that hamper our access to global science and technology that dampen our economic potential. The book also makes recommendations to reform the export control process, ensure scientific and technological competitiveness, and improve the non-immigrant visa system that regulates entry into the United States of foreign science and engineering students, scholars, and professionals. <br />
<br />
<em>Beyond "Fortress America" </em>contains vital information and action items for the President and policy makers that will affect the United States' ability to compete globally. Interested parties—including military personnel, engineers, scientists, professionals, industrialists, and scholars—will find this book a valuable tool for stemming a serious decline affecting broad areas of the nation's security and economy. <br />
<br />
 </p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12567">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/327'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>On Being a Scientist A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research: Third Edition</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12192"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2009:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12192#final</id>
    <published>2009-03-27T10:45:01-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-03-27T10:45:01-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The scientific research enterprise is built on a foundation of trust. Scientists trust that the results reported by others are valid. Society trusts that the results of research reflect an honest attempt by scientists to describe the world accurately and without bias. But this trust will endure only if the scientific community devotes itself to exemplifying and transmitting the values associated with ethical scientific conduct.<br />
<br />
<i>On Being a Scientist</i> was designed to supplement the informal lessons in ethics provided by research supervisors and mentors. The book describes the ethical foundations of scientific practices and some of the personal and professional issues that researchers encounter in their work. It applies to all forms of research—whether in academic, industrial, or governmental settings-and to all scientific disciplines. <br />
<br />
This third edition of <i>On Being a Scientist</i> reflects developments since the publication of the original edition in 1989 and a second edition in 1995. A continuing feature of this edition is the inclusion of a number of hypothetical scenarios offering guidance in thinking about and discussing these scenarios.<br />
<br />
<i>On Being a Scientist</i> is aimed primarily at graduate students and beginning researchers, but its lessons apply to all scientists at all stages of their scientific careers.<br />
 </p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12192">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/348'>Higher Education</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/307'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/286'>Explore Science</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/286'>Explore Science</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Science and Decisions Advancing Risk Assessment</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12209"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2009:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12209#final</id>
    <published>2009-02-24T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-12-03T10:45:01-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Risk assessment has become a dominant public policy tool for making choices, based on limited resources, to protect public health and the environment. It has been instrumental to the mission of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as well as other federal agencies in evaluating public health concerns, informing regulatory and technological decisions, prioritizing research needs and funding, and in developing approaches for cost-benefit analysis.</p>
<p>However, risk assessment is at a crossroads. Despite advances in the field, risk assessment faces a number of significant challenges including lengthy delays in making complex decisions; lack of data leading to significant uncertainty in risk assessments; and many chemicals in the marketplace that have not been evaluated and emerging agents requiring assessment.</p>
<p><i>Science and Decisions</i> makes practical scientific and technical recommendations to address these challenges. This book is a complement to the widely used 1983 National Academies book, Risk Assessment in the Federal Government (also known as the Red Book). The earlier book established a framework for the concepts and conduct of risk assessment that has been adopted by numerous expert committees, regulatory agencies, and public health institutions. The new book embeds these concepts within a broader framework for risk-based decision-making. Together, these are essential references for those working in the regulatory and public health fields.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12209">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/288'>Health and Medicine</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/399'>Public Health and Prevention</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/285'>Environment and Environmental Studies</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/371'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Fifteenth Interim Report of the Committee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12442"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2008:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12442#final</id>
    <published>2008-07-16T09:45:01-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-07-16T09:45:01-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        Extremely hazardous substances (EHSs) can be released accidentally as a result of chemical spills, industrial explosions, fires, or accidents involving railroad cars or trucks transporting EHSs or intentionally through terrorist activities. These substances can also be released by improper storage or handling. Workers and residents in communities surrounding industrial facilities where EHSs are manufactured, used, or stored and in communities along the nation's railways and highways are potentially at risk of being exposed to airborne EHSs during accidental or intentional releases. 
<p>In 1993, the National Advisory Committee was tasked with developing acute exposure guideline levels (AEGLs) for approximately 200 EHSs. This book is the fifteenth interim report from that committee. It summarizes the committee's conclusions and recommendations for improving documents for 16 chemicals and one chemical mixture identified as EHSs. The report also summarizes the committee's conclusions and recommendations for improving a draft white paper that proposes standard operating procedures for using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling as a tool in the AEGLs development program.
</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12442">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/290'>Math, Chemistry, and Physics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/409'>Chemistry</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/290'>Math, Chemistry, and Physics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/412'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Workshop Series on Issues in Space Science and Technology Summary of Space and Earth Science Issues from the Workshop on U.S. Civil Space Policy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12156"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2008:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12156#final</id>
    <published>2008-02-11T09:45:02-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-02-11T09:45:02-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        NASA has asked the Space Studies Board (SSB) of the NRC to examine issues related to space science and technology through a series of three workshops. The first of these was held in November 2007 in conjunction with another workshop being held jointly by the SSB and ASEB to assess U.S. civil space policy broadly. Some of the workshop sessions focused more than others on issues of interest to NASA's Science Mission Directorate (SMD). This book concentrates on those sessions and presents a summary of the views of the participants on the issues that are relevant to SMD. A separate book will be prepared on the full range of issues about U.S. civil space policy discussed at the workshop.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12156">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/293'>Space and Aeronautics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/418'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>International Benchmarking of U.S. Chemical Engineering Research Competitiveness</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11867"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2007:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11867#final</id>
    <published>2007-07-12T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        More than $400 billion worth of products rely on innovations in chemistry. Chemical engineering, as an academic discipline and profession, has enabled this achievement. In response to growing concerns about the future of the discipline, <i>International Benchmarking of U.S. Chemical Engineering Research Competitiveness</i> gauges the standing of the U.S. chemical engineering enterprise in the world. 
<p>
This in-depth benchmarking analysis is based on measures including numbers of published papers, citations, trends in degrees conferred, patent productivity, and awards. The book concludes that the United States is presently, and is expected to remain, among the world's leaders in all subareas of chemical engineering research. However, U.S. leadership in some classical and emerging subareas will be strongly challenged. 
<p>
This critical analysis will be of interest to practicing chemical engineers, professors and students in the discipline, economists, policy makers, major research university administrators, and executives in industries dependent upon innovations in chemistry.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11867">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/290'>Math, Chemistry, and Physics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/409'>Chemistry</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/284'>Engineering and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/365'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Beyond Bias and Barriers Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11741"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2007:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11741#final</id>
    <published>2007-05-04T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        The United States economy relies on the productivity, entrepreneurship, and creativity of its people. To maintain its scientific and engineering leadership amid increasing economic and educational globalization, the United States must aggressively pursue the innovative capacity of all its people—women and men. However, women face barriers to success in every field of science and engineering; obstacles that deprive the country of an important source of talent. Without a transformation of academic institutions to tackle such barriers, the future vitality of the U.S. research base and economy are in jeopardy. 
<p>
<i>Beyond Bias and Barriers</i> explains that eliminating gender bias in academia requires immediate overarching reform, including decisive action by university administrators, professional societies, federal funding agencies and foundations, government agencies, and Congress. If implemented and coordinated across public, private, and government sectors, the recommended actions will help to improve workplace environments for all employees while strengthening the foundations of America's competitiveness. 
        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11741">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/309'>Women and Minorities</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/348'>Higher Education</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ethical Considerations for Research Involving Prisoners</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11692"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2007:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11692#final</id>
    <published>2007-01-22T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2014-05-20T09:48:16-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        In the past 30 years, the population of prisoners in the United States has expanded almost 5-fold, correctional facilities are increasingly overcrowded, and more of the country's disadvantaged populations&#8212racial minorities, women, people with mental illness, and people with communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, hepatitis C, and tuberculosis&#8212are under correctional supervision. 
<p>
Because prisoners face restrictions on liberty and autonomy, have limited privacy, and often receive inadequate health care, they require specific protections when involved in research, particularly in today's correctional settings. Given these issues, the Department of Health and Human Services' Office for Human Research Protections commissioned the Institute of Medicine to review the ethical considerations regarding research involving prisoners. 
<p>
The resulting analysis contained in this book, Ethical Considerations for Research Involving Prisoners, emphasizes five broad actions to provide prisoners involved in research with critically important protections: 
<p>
 &#8226 expand the definition of "prisoner";
<p>
 &#8226 ensure universally and consistently applied standards of protection; 
<p>
 &#8226 shift from a category-based to a risk-benefit approach to research review; 
<p>
 &#8226 update the ethical framework to include collaborative responsibility; and 
<p>
 &#8226 enhance systematic oversight of research involving prisoners.
        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11692">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Academic Science and Engineering Report of a Workshop</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11766"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2006:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11766#final</id>
    <published>2006-11-15T15:35:38-05:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        During the last 40 years, the number of women studying science and engineering (S&E) has increased dramatically. Nevertheless, women do not hold academic faculty positions in numbers that commensurate with their increasing share of the S&E talent pool. The discrepancy exists at both the junior and senior faculty levels. In December 2005, the National Research Council held a workshop to explore these issues. Experts in a number of disciplines met to address what sex-differences research tells us about capability, behavior, career decisions, and achievement; the role of organizational structures and institutional policy; cross-cutting issues of race and ethnicity; key research needs and experimental paradigms and tools; and the ramifications of their research for policy, particularly for evaluating current and potential academic faculty. <i>Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Academic Science and Engineering</i> consists of three elements: an introduction, summaries of panel discussions including public comment sessions, and poster abstracts.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11766">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/309'>Women and Minorities</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/348'>Higher Education</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/407'>Workforce and Labor Issues</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Globalization, Biosecurity, and the Future of the Life Sciences</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11567"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2006:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11567#final</id>
    <published>2006-06-07T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Biomedical advances have made it possible to identify and manipulate features of living organisms in useful ways—leading to improvements in public health, agriculture, and other areas. The globalization of scientific and technical expertise also means that many scientists and other individuals around the world are generating breakthroughs in the life sciences and related technologies. The risks posed by bioterrorism and the proliferation of biological weapons capabilities have increased concern about how the rapid advances in genetic engineering and biotechnology could enable the production of biological weapons with unique and unpredictable characteristics. <i>Globalization, Biosecurity, and the Future of Life Sciences</i> examines current trends and future objectives of research in public health, life sciences, and biomedical science that contain applications relevant to developments in biological weapons 5 to 10 years into the future and ways to anticipate, identify, and mitigate these dangers.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11567">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/278'>Biology and Life Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/314'>Biotechnology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/328'>Prevention, Security and Response</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/472'>Biosecurity</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Fundamental Role of Science and Technology in International Development An Imperative for the U.S. Agency for International Development</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11583"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2006:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11583#final</id>
    <published>2006-05-24T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        In October 2003 the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the National Research Council (NRC) entered into a cooperative agreement. The agreement called for the NRC to examine selected aspects of U.S. foreign assistance activities—primarily the programs of the USAID—that have benefited or could benefit from access to strong science, technology, and medical capabilities in the United States or elsewhere. After considering the many aspects of the role of science and technology (S&T) in foreign assistance, the study led to the publication of <i>The Fundamental Role of Science and Technology in International Development</i>. In the book special attention is devoted to partnerships that involve the USAID together with international, regional, U.S. governmental, and private sector organizations in fields such as heath care, agriculture and nutrition, education and job creation, and energy and the environment. This book explores specific programmatic, organizational, and personnel reforms that would increase the effective use of S&T to meet the USAID's goals while supporting larger U.S. foreign policy objectives.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11583">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/327'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reaping the Benefits of Genomic and Proteomic Research Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation,  and Public Health</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11487"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2006:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11487#final</id>
    <published>2006-03-09T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        The patenting and licensing of human genetic material and proteins represents an extension of intellectual property (IP) rights to naturally occurring biological material and scientific information, much of it well upstream of drugs and other disease therapies. This report concludes that IP restrictions rarely impose significant burdens on biomedical research, but there are reasons to be apprehensive about their future impact on scientific advances in this area. The report recommends 13 actions that policy-makers, courts, universities, and health and patent officials should take to prevent the increasingly complex web of IP protections from getting in the way of potential breakthroughs in genomic and proteomic research. It endorses the National Institutes of Health guidelines for technology licensing, data sharing, and research material exchanges and says that oversight of compliance should be strengthened. It recommends enactment of a statutory exception from infringement liability for research on a patented invention and raising the bar somewhat to qualify for a patent on upstream research discoveries in biotechnology. With respect to genetic diagnostic tests to detect patient mutations associated with certain diseases, the report urges patent holders to allow others to perform the tests for purposes of verifying the results.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11487">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/278'>Biology and Life Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/317'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/278'>Biology and Life Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/314'>Biotechnology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Expanding Access to Research Data Reconciling Risks and Opportunities</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11434"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11434#final</id>
    <published>2005-11-11T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        Policy makers need information about the nation—ranging from trends in the overall
economy down to the use by individuals of Medicare—in order to evaluate existing
programs and to develop new ones. This information often comes from research
based on data about individual people, households, and businesses and other organizations,
collected by statistical agencies.
The benefit of increasing data accessibility to researchers and analysts is better
informed public policy. To realize this benefit, a variety of modes for data access—
including restricted access to confidential data and unrestricted access to appropriately
altered public-use data—must be used. The risk of expanded access to potentially
sensitive data is the increased probability of breaching the confidentiality of the
data and, in turn, eroding public confidence in the data collection enterprise.
Indeed, the statistical system of the United States ultimately depends on the willingness
of the public to provide the information on which research data are based.
<i>Expanding Access to Research Data</i> issues guidance on how to more fully exploit
these tradeoffs. The panel's recommendations focus on needs highlighted by legal,
social, and technological changes that have occurred during the last decade.
        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11434">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/279'>Computers and Information Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/323'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/279'>Computers and Information Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/320'>Information Security and Privacy</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/477'>Surveys and Statistics</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/478'>Surveys and Statistics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/478'>Surveys and Statistics</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ethical Considerations for Research on Housing-Related Health Hazards Involving Children</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11450"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11450#final</id>
    <published>2005-11-10T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <i>Ethical Considerations for Research on Housing-Related Health Hazards Involving Children</i>
explores the ethical issues posed when conducting research designed to identify,
understand, or ameliorate housing-related health hazards among children. Such
research involves children as subjects and is conducted in the home and in communities.
It is often conducted with children in low-income families given the disproportionate
prevalence of housing-related conditions such as lead poisoning, asthma,
and fatal injuries among these children. This book emphasizes five key elements to
address the particular ethical concerns raised by these characteristics: involving the
affected community in the research and responding to their concerns; ensuring that
parents understand the essential elements of the research; adopting uniform federal
guidelines for such research by all sponsors (Subpart D of 45 CFR 46); providing guidance
on key terms in the regulations; and viewing research oversight as a system with
important roles for researchers, IRBs and their research institutions, sponsors and regulators
of research, and the community.
        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11450">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/303'>Children, Youth and Families</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/288'>Health and Medicine</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/398'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Policy Implications of International Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Scholars in the United States</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11289"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11289#final</id>
    <published>2005-09-12T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        Policy Implications of International Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Scholars in the United States explores the role and impact of students and scholars on US educational institutions and the US economy. The nation has drawn increasingly on human resources abroad for its science and engineering workforce. However, competition for talent has grown as other countries have expanded their research infrastructure and created more opportunities for international students. The report discusses trends in international student enrollments, stay rates, and examines the impact of visa policies on international mobility of the highly skilled.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11289">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/352'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Opportunities in High Magnetic Field Science</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11211"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11211#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-26T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        High-field magnets—those that operate at the limits of the mechanical and/or electromagnetic properties of their structural materials—are used as research tools in a variety of scientific disciplines. The study of high magnetic fields themselves is also important in many areas such as astrophysics. Because of their importance in scientific research and the possibility of new breakthroughs, the National Science Foundation asked the National Research Council to assess the current state of and future prospects for high-field science and technology in the United States. This report presents the results of that assessment. It focuses on scientific and technological challenges and opportunities, and not on specific program activities. The report provides findings and recommendations about important research directions, the relative strength of U.S. efforts compared to other countries, and ways in which the program can operate more effectively.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11211">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/290'>Math, Chemistry, and Physics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/412'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Future National Research Policies Within the Industrialized Nations Report of a Symposium</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1975"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1975#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This book is a summary and proceedings of a symposium sponsored by the Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable and the National Science Foundation. It includes presentations by senior government science policy officials and leading scientists who are directly involved in the research and higher education policy formulation processes in various countries. Included are their assessments of current challenges to their national research systems, descriptions of national strategies for meeting these challenges, and a discussion of options for national research systems in the twenty-first century.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1975">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Trends in the Early Careers of Life Scientists</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/6244"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/6244#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>In each year between 1994 and 1996, more than 7,000 individuals received a Ph.D. in life-science, and the number of graduates is rising sharply. If present trends continue, about half of those graduates will have found permanent positions as independent researchers within ten years after graduation. These statistics—and the labor market situation they reflect—can be viewed either positively or negatively depending on whether one is a young scientist seeking a career or an established investigator whose productivity depends on the labor provided by an abundant number of graduate students.</p>
<p>This book examines the data concerning the production of doctorates in life-science and the changes in the kinds of positions graduates have obtained. It discusses the impact of those changes and suggests ways to deal with the challenges of supply versus demand for life-science Ph.D. graduates. <i>Trends in the Early Careers of Life Scientists</i> will serve as an information resource for young scientists deciding on career paths and as a basis for discussion by educators and policymakers as they examine the current system of education linked to research and decide if changes in that system are needed.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/6244">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/407'>Workforce and Labor Issues</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bits of Power Issues in Global Access to Scientific Data</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/5504"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/5504#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p><i>Bits of Power</i> assesses the state of international exchange of data in the natural sciences, identifying strengths, weaknesses, and challenges. The book makes recommendations about access to scientific data derived from public funding. It examines trends in the electronic transfer and management of scientific data, pressure toward commericalization of scientific data, the implications of proposed changes to intellectual property laws, and improving access to scientific data by and from the developing world.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/5504">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/279'>Computers and Information Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/321'>Information Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/279'>Computers and Information Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/320'>Information Security and Privacy</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Fateful Choices The Future of the U.S. Academic Research Enterprise</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1980"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1980#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This volume describes a vision for the future of U.S. academic research and the near-term actions and policies required to maintain the quality of academic research in the United States. It also describes longer-term strategic considerations for the enterprise in the next century, concluding with a discussion of new approaches to decision making within the academic research enterprise.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1980">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reports of the Committee on Vision 1947-1990</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1456"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1456#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This is a summary of reports issued since 1947 under the aegis of the National Research Council's Committee on Vision. An abstract summarizing the contents of each report is provided together with information to assist the reader in obtaining copies of the information about early research efforts in such classic areas of vision science as visual search, form discrimination, and aging—together with current problems such as the use of video display terminals. The book will aid vision scientists in gaining a thorough understanding of the recent historical context of vision research.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1456">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ensuring the Quality of Data Disseminated by the Federal Government Workshop Report</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10666"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10666#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The National Academies Science, Technology, and Law Program convened three workshops focusing on specific aspects of OMB's "Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies." The workshops were intended to assist the agencies in developing their agency-specific implementation guidelines. This workshop report details the approaches agencies are considering using to implement the guidelines.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10666">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Setting Priorities for Large Research Facility Projects Supported by the National Science Foundation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10895"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10895#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        In 1995, the National Science Foundation (NSF) created a special account to fund large (several tens of millions of dollars) research facilities. Over the years, these facilities have come to represent an increasingly prominent part of the nation's R&D portfolio. Recently concern has intensified about the way NSF is selecting projects for this account. In 2003, six U.S. Senators including the chair and ranking member of the Senate Subcommittee on VA, HUD, and Independent Agencies Appropriations expressed these concerns in a letter to the NRC asking it to "review the current prioritization process and report to us on how it can be improved." This report presents a series of recommendations on how NSF can improve its priority setting process for large research facilities. While noting that NSF has improved this process, the report states that further strengthening is needed if NSF is to meet future demands for such projects.

        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10895">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/293'>Space and Aeronautics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/417'>Astronomy and Astrophysics</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Headline News, Science Views II</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/2043"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/2043#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Why all the talk about biodiversity? Is malaria really making a comeback? Just what are computer viruses? Many Americans are confused about these and other issues involving science, technology, and health care but lack the time or technical background to read scientific reports. <i>Headline News, Science Views II</i> provides short, readable answers directly from the experts. Leading scientists, engineers, and others discuss today's issues in language that is understandable and compelling—without jargon.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/2043">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Careers in Science and Technology An International Perspective</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/5109"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/5109#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Every industrialized country is concerned with maintaining an adequate supply of individuals interested in careers in science and technology, yet little is known about these efforts outside national borders. This book represents the proceedings of an international conference on Trends in Science and Technology Careers, held in Brussels in 1993. Organized at the behest of OSEP and the OIA Committee on International Organizations and Programs, in cooperation with the European Commission (DG XII) and in response to a resolution of the International Council of Scientific Unions, the conference identified international data on career trends, assessed the research base engaged in studying science and technology careers, and identified ways in which international organizations could promote greater interest in science and technology human resource development. The conference laid the groundwork for continuing international discussions about the best ways to study and promote careers in science and technology and national dialogues about the ways to integrate this knowledge into human resources policies.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/5109">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/284'>Engineering and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/365'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Allocating Federal Funds for Science and Technology</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/5040"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/5040#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The United States faces a new challenge—maintaining the vitality of its system for supporting science and technology despite fiscal stringency during the next several years. To address this change, the Senate Appropriations Committee requested a report from the National Academies of Sciences and Engineering and the Institute of Medicine to address "the criteria that should be used in judging the appropriate allocation of funds to research and development activities; to examine the appropriate balance among different types of institutions that conduct such research; and to look at the means of assuring continued objectivity in the allocation process."</p>
<p>In this eagerly-awaited book, a committee of experts selected by the National Academies and the Institute responds with 13 recommendations that propose a new budgeting process and formulates a series of questions to address during that process. The committee also makes corollary recommendations about merit review, government oversight, linking research and development to government missions, the synergy between research and education, and other topics. The recommendations are aimed at rooting out obsolete and inadequate activities to free resources from good programs for even better ones, in the belief that "science and technology will be at least as important in the future as they have been in the past in dealing with problems that confront the nation."</p>
<p>The authoring committee of this book was chaired by Frank Press, former President of the National Academy of Sciences (1981-1993) and Presidential Science and Technology Advisor (1977-1981).</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/5040">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/304'>Economics</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Impact of Selling the Federal Helium Reserve</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9860"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9860#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The Helium Privatization Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-273) directs the Department of the Interior to begin liquidating the U.S. Federal Helium Reserve by 2005 in a manner consistent with "minimum market disruption" and at a price given by a formula specified in the act. It also mandates that the Department of the Interior "enter into appropriate arrangements with the National Academy of Sciences to study and report on whether such disposal of helium reserves will have a substantial adverse effect on U.S. scientific, technical, biomedical, or national security interests."</p>
<p>This report is the product of that mandate. To provide context, the committee has examined the helium market and the helium industry as a whole to determine how helium users would be affected under various scenarios for selling the reserve within the act's constraints.</p>
<p>The Federal Helium Reserve, the Bush Dome reservoir, and the Cliffside facility are mentioned throughout this report. It is important to recognize that they are distinct entities. The Federal Helium Reserve is federally owned crude helium gas that currently resides in the Bush Dome reservoir. The Cliffside facility includes the storage facility on the Bush Dome reservoir and the associated buildings pipeline.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9860">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/283'>Energy and Energy Conservation</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/356'>Energy Resources</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cutting Edge Technologies</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/286"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/286#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        Experts in computers, biotechnology, structural materials, and transportation provide a concise introduction to the promising technologies in these four exciting fields that affect all of society. Each section begins with a brief overview of the field, followed by more detailed papers describing specific technological advances, their current and projected applications, and the obstacles that must be overcome to ensure future progress.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/286">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/284'>Engineering and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/364'>Materials</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Advancing the Nation's Health Needs NIH Research Training Programs</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11275"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11275#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        This report is the twelfth assessment of the National Institutes of Health National Research Service Awards program. The research training needs of the country in basic biomedical, clinical, and behavioral and social sciences are considered. Also included are the training needs of oral health, nursing, and health services research. The report has been broadly constructed to take into account the rapidly evolving national and international health care needs. The past and present are analyzed, and predictions with regard to future needs are presented.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11275">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/288'>Health and Medicine</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/394'>Education and Training</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/351'>Medical Training and Workforce</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Securing the Future Regional and National Programs to Support the Semiconductor Industry</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10677"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10677#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        Based on the deliberations of a high-level international conference, this report summarizes the presentations of an exceptional group of experts, convened by Intel's Chairman Emeritus Gordon Moore and SEMATECH's Chairman Emeritus William Spencer. The report documents the critical technological challenges facing this key industry and the rapid growth in government-industry partnerships overseas to support centers of semiconductor research and production in national economies. Importantly, the report provides a series of recommendations designed to strengthen U.S. research in disciplines supporting the continued growth of semiconductor industry, an industry which has made major contributions to the remarkable increases in productivity in the U.S. economy.
        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10677">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/284'>Engineering and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/360'>Applications of Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Intentional Human Dosing Studies for EPA Regulatory Purposes Scientific and Ethical Issues</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10927"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10927#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The EPA commissioned The National Academies to provide advice on the vexing question of whether and, if so, under what circumstances EPA should accept and consider intentional human dosing studies conducted by companies or other sources outside the agency (so-called third parties) to gather evidence relating to the risks of a chemical or the conditions under which exposure to it could be judged safe. This report recommends that such studies be conducted and used for regulatory purposes only if all of several strict conditions are met, including the following:</p>
<ul>
    <li>The study is necessary and scientifically valid, meaning that it addresses an important regulatory question that can't be answered with animal studies or nondosing human studies;</li>
    <li>The societal benefits of the study outweigh any anticipated risks to participants. At no time, even when benefits beyond improved regulation exist, can a human dosing study be justified that is anticipated to cause lasting harm to study participants; and </li>
    <li>All recognized ethical standards and procedures for protecting the interests of study participants are observed.</li>
</ul>
<p>In addition, EPA should establish a Human Studies Review Board (HSRB) to evaluate all human dosing studies–both at the beginning and upon completion of the experiments–if they are carried out with the intent of affecting the agency's policy-making.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10927">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/285'>Environment and Environmental Studies</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/369'>Environmental Health and Safety</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Science and Technology in the National Interest Ensuring the Best Presidential and Federal Advisory Committee Science and Technology Appointments</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11152"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11152#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        In 2004, an ad hoc committee was charged with preparing this third report examining the most senior S&T appointments to federal government positions and updating the accompanying list of the most urgent S&T presidential appointments. Sufficient changes have occurred since the National Academies 2000 report on presidential appointments—including the 2001 terrorist attacks, the anthrax deaths, the reorganization of homeland-security activities in the federal government, new developments in S&T, and concerns about the politicization of S&T decision making and advice—to warrant this new edition. In contrast with previous reports on the subject, this one covers not only presidential appointments to top S&T leadership positions but also the appointment of scientists, engineers, and health professionals to serve on federal advisory committees that focus on science-based policy or on the review of research proposals. The committee recognizes that other areas of federal responsibility are as important as S&T, but S&T appointments are the only ones within its purview.                <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Question of Balance Private Rights and the Public Interest in Scientific and Technical Databases</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9692"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9692#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>New legal approaches, such as the European Union's 1996 Directive on the Legal Protection of Databases, and other legal initiatives now being considered in the United States at the federal and state level, are threatening to compromise public access to scientific and technical data available through computerized databases. Lawmakers are struggling to strike an appropriate balance between the rights of database rights holders, who are concerned about possible commercial misappropriation of their products, and public-interest users of the data such as researchers, educators, and libraries.</p>
<p><i>A Question of Balance</i> examines this balancing act. The committee concludes that because database rights holders already enjoy significant legal, technical, and market-based protections, the need for statutory protection has not been sufficiently substantiated. Nevertheless, although the committee opposes the creation of any strong new protective measures, it recognizes that some additional limits against wholesale misappropriation of databases may be necessary. In particular, a new, properly scoped and focused U.S. statute might provide a reasonable alternative to the European Union's highly protectionistic database directive. Such legislation could then serve as a legal model for an international treaty in this area. The book recommends a number of guiding principles for such possible legislation, as well as related policy actions for the administration.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9692">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/279'>Computers and Information Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/320'>Information Security and Privacy</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>On Being a Scientist Responsible Conduct in Research, Second Edition</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/4917"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/4917#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>First published in 1988 and now updated, <i>On Being a Scientist</i> presents discussions of the social and historical context of science, the allocation of credit for discovery, the scientist's role in society, the issues revolving around publication, and many other aspects of scientific work. The booklet explores the inevitable conflicts that arise when the black and white areas of science meet the gray areas of human values and biases.</p>                <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/307'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/286'>Explore Science</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/286'>Explore Science</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/348'>Higher Education</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Peer Review in the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology Interim Report</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/5939"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/5939#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The Office of Science and Technology (OST) of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Office of Environmental Management (EM) recently has instituted a peer review program that uses the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), with administrative and technical support provided by the Institute for Regulatory Science (RSI), to conduct peer reviews of technologies (or groups of technologies) at various stages of development.</p>
<p>OST asked the NRC to convene an expert committee to evaluate the effectiveness of its new peer review program and to make specific recommendations to improve the program, if appropriate. This is the first of two reports to be prepared by this committee on OST's new peer review program. OST requested this interim report to provide a preliminary assessment of OST's new peer review program. In the final report, the committee will provide a more detailed assessment of OST's peer review program after its first complete annual cycle.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/5939">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/283'>Energy and Energy Conservation</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/358'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/285'>Environment and Environmental Studies</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/376'>Waste Disposal and Clean Up</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Science and Technology in the National Interest The Presidential Appointment Process</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9973"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9973#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        This report is the second edition of the 1992 COSEPUP report "Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." As was the case with the original report, this report analyzes the federal government's capacity to recruit highly qualified individuals for the top science and technology (S&T)-related leadership positions in the executive branch and makes appropriate recommendations.         <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9973">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/407'>Workforce and Labor Issues</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Convergence of Science and Law A Summary Report of the First Meeting of the Science, Technology, and Law Panel</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10174"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10174#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2015-08-11T13:01:44-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This report is a summary of the first meeting of the Science, Technology, and Law Panel. The Policy Division of the National Research Council established the panel to bring the science and engineering community and the legal community together on a regular basis to explore pressing issues, to improve communication, and to help resolve such issues between these communities.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10174">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/306'>Law and Justice</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Access to Research Data in the 21st Century An Ongoing Dialogue Among Interested Parties: Report of a Workshop</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10302"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10302#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>In the years since the Shelby Amendment, scientists, industry, and policy makers have struggled over how the public's new right of access should be applied to scientific data. There is loose agreement that research data should be accessible, but wide disagreement over the "depth" to which the public has such a right. The National Academies' Science, Technology, and Law Program held a workshop to explore the mounting tensions in the federal regulatory process between the need to provide access to research data and the need to protect the integrity of the research process. The workshop provided a picture of the debate arising from passage of the Shelby Amendment and the resulting OMB revisions of Circular A-110. This report is a summary of the workshop.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10302">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/288'>Health and Medicine</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/399'>Public Health and Prevention</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10770"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10770#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This volume assembles papers commissioned by the National Research Council's Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy (STEP) to inform judgments about the significant institutional and policy changes in the patent system made over the past two decades. The chapters fall into three areas. The first four chapters consider the determinants and effects of changes in patent "quality." Quality refers to whether patents issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) meet the statutory standards of patentability, including novelty, nonobviousness, and utility. The fifth and sixth chapters consider the growth in patent litigation, which may itself be a function of changes in the quality of contested patents. The final three chapters explore controversies associated with the extension of patents into new domains of technology, including biomedicine, software, and business methods.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10770">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/304'>Economics</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ethical Conduct of Clinical Research Involving Children</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10958"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10958#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <P>In recent decades, advances in biomedical research have helped save or
lengthen the lives of children around the world. With improved therapies,
child and adolescent mortality rates have decreased significantly in the last
half century. Despite these advances, pediatricians and others argue that
children have not shared equally with adults in biomedical advances. Even
though we want children to benefit from the dramatic and accelerating
rate of progress in medical care that has been fueled by scientific research,
we do not want to place children at risk of being harmed by participating
in clinical studies.</P>
<i>Ethical Conduct of Clinical Research Involving Children</i> considers the necessities
and challenges of this type of research and reviews the ethical and
legal standards for conducting it. It also considers problems with the interpretation
and application of these standards and conduct, concluding that
while children should not be excluded from potentially beneficial clinical
studies, some research that is ethically permissible for adults is not acceptable
for children, who usually do not have the legal capacity or maturity to
make informed decisions about research participation. The book looks at
the need for appropriate pediatric expertise at all stages of the design,
review, and conduct of a research project to effectively implement policies
to protect children. It argues persuasively that a robust system for protecting
human research participants in general is a necessary foundation for
protecting child research participants in particular.</P>
 
        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10958">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/288'>Health and Medicine</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/398'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11153"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11153#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <I>Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research</I> examines current interdisciplinary research efforts and recommends ways to stimulate and support such research. 
<P>
Advances in science and engineering increasingly require the collaboration of scholars from various fields. This shift is driven by the need to address complex problems that cut across traditional disciplines, and the capacity of new technologies to both transform existing disciplines and generate new ones. At the same time, however, interdisciplinary research can be impeded by policies on hiring, promotion, tenure, proposal review, and resource allocation that favor traditional disciplines.
<P>
This report identifies steps that researchers, teachers, students, institutions, funding organizations, and disciplinary societies can take to more effectively conduct, facilitate, and evaluate interdisciplinary research programs and projects. Throughout the report key concepts are illustrated with case studies and results of the committee's surveys of individual researchers and university provosts. 
        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11153">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/278'>Biology and Life Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/313'>Biology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Challenge of Numbers People in the Mathematical Sciences</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1506"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1506#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p><i>A Challenge of Numbers</i> describes the circumstances and issues centered on people in the mathematical sciences, principally students and teachers at U.S. colleges and universities. A healthy flow of mathematical talent is crucial not only to the future of U.S. mathematics but also as a keystone supporting a technological workforce. Trends in the mathematical sciences' most valuable resource—its people—are presented narratively, graphically, and numerically as an information base for policymakers and for those interested in the people in this not very visible, but critical profession.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1506">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/290'>Math, Chemistry, and Physics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/410'>Math and Statistics</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/478'>Surveys and Statistics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/478'>Surveys and Statistics</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
