<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<feed xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>New Titles from the National Academies Press | Policy for Science and Technology</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.nap.edu/topics.php?topic=423" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.nap.edu/rss?topic=423"/>
  <id>https://www.nap.edu/rss?topic=423</id>
  <updated>2026-04-11T22:20:03-04:00</updated>
  <subtitle>Science books from the publishers for the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Research Council</subtitle>

  <entry>
    <title>Strategies to Enhance NIH-Funded Pediatric Research Optimizing Child Health</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29346"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2026:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29346#prepub</id>
    <published>2026-01-28T10:44:23-05:00</published>
    <updated>2026-01-28T12:35:53-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Prepublication Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Recent advances in pediatric health, such as declines in child mortality, would never have happened without significant and consistent federal investment - supported by Congress and led by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Despite these advances, there is broad consensus among experts that child health is in crisis as children in the United States are experiencing rising rates of chronic diseases and poor mental, emotional, and behavioral health.   </p>
<p>NIH tasked the National Academies with convening a committee to examine NIH's pediatric research portfolio and structure and to provide recommendations focused on improving NIH's overall support of pediatric health research. The resulting report provides evidence and eight recommendations to guide NIH's integration of a pediatric and life-course focus throughout its research and funding priorities.</p>            <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29346">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/288'>Health and Medicine</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/386'>Children's Health</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/288'>Health and Medicine</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/391'>Health Sciences</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Simplifying Research Regulations and Policies Optimizing American Science</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29231"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2025:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29231#final</id>
    <published>2025-10-10T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2025-11-07T13:44:09-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The U.S. scientific enterprise has produced countless discoveries that have led to significant advances in technology, health, security, safety, and economic prosperity. However, concern exists that excessive, uncoordinated, and duplicative policies and regulations surrounding research are hampering progress and jeopardizing American scientific competitiveness. Estimates suggest the typical U.S. academic researcher spends more than 40 percent of their federally funded research time on administrative and regulatory matters, wasting intellectual capacity and taxpayer dollars. Although administrative and regulatory compliance work can be vital aspects of research, the time spent by researchers on such activities continues to increase because of a dramatic rise in regulations, policies, and requirements over time.</p>
<p>To better ensure that the research community is maximally productive while simultaneously ensuring the safety, accountability, security, and ethical conduct of publicly funded research, Simplifying Research Regulations and Policies: Optimizing American Science examines current federal research regulations. This report identifies ways to improve regulatory processes and administrative tasks, reduce or eliminate unnecessary work, and modify and remove policies and regulations that have outlived their purpose while maintaining necessary and appropriate integrity, accountability, and oversight.  Simplifying Research Regulations provides a roadmap for establishing a more agile and resource-effective regulatory framework for federally funded research.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29231">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Science and Practice of Team Science</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29043"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2025:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29043#final</id>
    <published>2025-09-08T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2025-11-07T13:25:11-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>As scientific problems grow more complex and interdisciplinary, the need for effective, collaborative, and context-sensitive research teams has never been greater. The Science and Practice of Team Science presents an updated, evidence-based roadmap for supporting science teams across a wide variety of domains, disciplines, and organizational structures.</p>
<p>This new report from the National Academies builds on a decade of learning since the landmark Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science report. It examines how evolving forces - including digital innovation, global disruptions, and the rise of virtual collaboration - are reshaping the way scientific teams form, function, and deliver results. From small interdisciplinary groups to large-scale, distributed multiteam systems, today's science teams require flexible strategies tailored to their goals, environments, and challenges.</p>
<p>The Science and Practice of Team Science outlines adaptable practices that enhance team dynamics and productivity across all phases of research - from development to implementation to translation. These include the use of team charters, psychological safety, communication strategies, and project management. This report also emphasizes the role of technology in enabling collaboration while cautioning that tools must be intentionally deployed to support accessibility, training, and integration with workflows.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29043">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/404'>Human Systems and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer For the Year Ended December 31, 2024</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29218"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2025:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29218#final</id>
    <published>2025-08-01T10:44:56-04:00</published>
    <updated>2025-11-07T13:43:23-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2024.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/29218">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Principles and Practices for a Federal Statistical Agency Eighth Edition</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27934"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2025:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27934#final</id>
    <published>2025-05-28T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2026-01-29T10:31:41-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The 8th Edition of Principles and Practices for a Federal Statistical Agency supports the essential role of relevant, credible, trusted, independent, and innovative government statistics. Since 1992, this report has described the characteristics of effective federal statistical agencies. Government statistics are widely used to inform decisions by policymakers, program administrators, businesses and other organizations, as well as households and the general public.</p>
<p>Principles and Practices is a concise tool to communicate the unique responsibilities of federal statistical agencies. It underscores the invaluable role that relevant, timely, accurate, and trustworthy government statistics play to inform the public and policymakers. Since 2001, an updated edition is released at the beginning of each presidential term.</p>
<p>This eighth edition retains the five principles and ten practices established in prior editions, including updated examples and extensive appendices to reflect the many and varied changes across the national statistical system that have occurred since the passage of the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018 ("Evidence Act"), the CHIPS and Science Act, and implementing regulations.</p>         <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27934">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/477'>Surveys and Statistics</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/478'>Surveys and Statistics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/478'>Surveys and Statistics</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>International Talent Programs in the Changing Global Environment</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27787"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2024:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27787#final</id>
    <published>2024-12-23T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2024-12-23T08:31:29-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The U.S. science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce plays a vital role in fostering and sustaining innovation, economic competitiveness, and national security. This workforce currently depends, and for the foreseeable future will depend, on both international and domestic talent. Foreign STEM talent contributes to domestic innovation, economic growth, and U.S. leadership in science and technology and also expands perspectives and networks essential to future scientific collaborations and discoveries.</p>
<p>At the request of the U.S. Department of Defense, this report
reviews foreign and domestic talent or incentive programs and
their corresponding scientific, economic, and national security benefits. International Talent Programs in the Changing Global Environment makes recommendations to improve the effectiveness of U.S. mechanisms for attracting and retaining international students and scholars relative to the programs and incentives other nations use to support national research capabilities, especially in national security and defense-related
fields.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27787">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer For the Year Ended December 31, 2023</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27783"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2024:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27783#final</id>
    <published>2024-07-01T09:45:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2024-07-01T09:45:05-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations
as well as a review of the endowment and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2023.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27783">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Toward a New Era of Data Sharing Summary of the US-UK Scientific Forum on Researcher Access to Data</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27520"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2024:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27520#final</id>
    <published>2024-03-28T09:45:07-04:00</published>
    <updated>2024-03-28T09:45:13-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Data are at the forefront of efforts to solve many of today's greatest problems, including climate change, misinformation and disinformation, the threat of future global pandemics, and the quest by people everywhere to lead better lives. But if researchers are going to use data to contribute to the solutions of problems, data need to be available for them to use. Over time, data have become increasingly voluminous, complex, and heterogeneous. Massive volumes of data are being generated by new devices and methods, and many of these data are not easy to analyze, interpret, or share. Groups that generate data may be reluctant to share them for a variety of professional, personal, financial, regulatory, and statutory reasons.</p><p>These issues were addressed during the US-UK Scientific Forum on Researcher Access to Data held in Washington, DC, on September 12-13, 2023. Organized by the National Academy of Sciences and the Royal Society, the forum examined the constellation of issues surrounding researchers' access to data, best practices and lessons learned from exemplary research disciplines, and new ideas and techniques that could drive research forward. This publication summarizes the presentations and discussions of the forum.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27520">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer For the Year Ended December 31, 2022</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27135"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2023:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27135#final</id>
    <published>2023-06-23T08:58:50-04:00</published>
    <updated>2023-06-23T09:01:31-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2022.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/27135">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Improving Representation in Clinical Trials and Research Building Research Equity for Women and Underrepresented Groups</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26479"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2022:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26479#final</id>
    <published>2022-07-13T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2022-07-13T10:56:35-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The United States has long made substantial investments in clinical research with the goal of improving the health and well-being of our nation. There is no doubt that these investments have contributed significantly to treating and preventing disease and extending human life. Nevertheless, clinical research faces a critical shortcoming. Currently, large swaths of the U.S. population, and those that often face the greatest health challenges, are less able to benefit from these discoveries because they are not adequately represented in clinical research studies. While progress has been made with representation of white women in clinical trials and clinical research, there has been little progress in the last three decades to increase participation of racial and ethnic minority population groups. This underrepresentation is compounding health disparities, with serious consequences for underrepresented groups and for the nation.</p>
<p>At the request of Congress, Improving Representation in Clinical Trials and Research: Building Research Equity for Women and Underrepresented Groups identifies policies, procedures, programs, or projects aimed at increasing the inclusion of these groups in clinical research and the specific strategies used by those conducting clinical trials and clinical and translational research to improve diversity and inclusion. This report models the potential economic benefits of full inclusion of men, women, and racial and ethnic groups in clinical research and highlights new programs and interventions in medical centers and other clinical settings designed to increase participation.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26479">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2021</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26628"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2022:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26628#final</id>
    <published>2022-06-29T10:45:01-04:00</published>
    <updated>2022-06-29T10:45:06-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2021.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26628">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2020</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26227"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2021:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26227#final</id>
    <published>2021-06-24T09:45:01-04:00</published>
    <updated>2021-06-24T11:00:29-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences(NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from government and other sponsors to pay for the large number of studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Research Council (NRC), and a much smaller sum that we withdraw from our own endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council.</p>
<p>This last year presented many challenges for the institution, as the COVID-19 pandemic began to effect operations in March 2020. At that time, the NAS/NRC decided to move to remote work for all staff and virtual meetings for committee and other convening activities. The move to virtual activity has been more successful than envisioned, with each part of the institution being able to operate surprisingly efficiently and effectively in such an environment. During the period from March through December 2020, the institution held hundreds of virtual webinars, workshops, lectures, and symposia, some with attendance into the thousands. The NRC released approximately 200 consensus studies, proceedings, and other publications during this period.</p>
<p>This Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2020.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26227">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Impact of COVID-19 on the Careers of Women in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26061"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2021:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26061#final</id>
    <published>2021-05-20T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2021-05-20T08:05:58-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The spring of 2020 marked a change in how almost everyone conducted their personal and professional lives, both within science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) and beyond. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted global scientific conferences and individual laboratories and required people to find space in their homes from which to work. It blurred the boundaries between work and non-work, infusing ambiguity into everyday activities. While adaptations that allowed people to connect became more common, the evidence available at the end of 2020 suggests that the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic endangered the engagement, experience, and retention of women in academic STEMM, and may roll back some of the achievement gains made by women in the academy to date.</p>
<p><i>The Impact of COVID-19 on the Careers of Women in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine</i> identifies, names, and documents how the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the careers of women in academic STEMM during the initial 9-month period since March 2020 and considers how these disruptions - both positive and negative - might shape future progress for women. This publication builds on the 2020 report <i>Promising Practices for Addressing the Underrepresentation of Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine</i> to develop a comprehensive understanding of the nuanced ways these disruptions have manifested. <i>The Impact of COVID-19 on the Careers of Women in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine</i> will inform the academic community as it emerges from the pandemic to mitigate any long-term negative consequences for the continued advancement of women in the academic STEMM workforce and build on the adaptations and opportunities that have emerged.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26061">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Endless Frontier The Next 75 Years in Science</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25990"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2020:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25990#final</id>
    <published>2020-12-17T10:46:20-05:00</published>
    <updated>2020-12-17T10:46:26-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The National Academy of Sciences hosted a symposium on February 26, 2020, that gathered top business, academic, and government leaders to explore whether the modern research architecture that fuels U.S. innovation needs to be reconfigured to meet the challenges of our time. The event was held in partnership with The Kavli Foundation and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation to mark the 75th anniversary of the publication of Vannevar Bush's seminal report <i>Science, the Endless Frontier</i>, which created a blueprint for U.S. scientific research in the post-World War II era. Bush's report empowered government support for innovation and basic research at the nation's universities and the policies that ultimately drove U.S. prosperity, health, and national security. This publication summarizes the presentations and discussion at the symposium focused on the future of pathways to leadership in science, how to respond to changes in the research enterprise, science and the public, the evolution of the government-university partnership, and connecting basic research with economic growth in the decades to come.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25990">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2019</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25854"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2020:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25854#final</id>
    <published>2020-06-29T13:46:03-04:00</published>
    <updated>2020-06-29T13:46:10-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>

<p>This <i>Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences</i> presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2019. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25854">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Promising Practices for Addressing the Underrepresentation of Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine Opening Doors</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25585"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2020:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25585#final</id>
    <published>2020-03-19T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2020-04-02T11:46:57-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Careers in science, engineering, and medicine offer opportunities to advance knowledge, contribute to the well-being of communities, and support the security, prosperity, and health of the United States. But many women do not pursue or persist in these careers, or advance to leadership positions - not because they lack the talent or aspirations, but because they face barriers, including: implicit and explicit bias; sexual harassment; unequal access to funding and resources; pay inequity; higher teaching and advising loads; and fewer speaking invitations, among others.</p>
<p>There are consequences from this underrepresentation of women for the nation as well: a labor shortage in many science, engineering, and medical professions that cannot be filled unless institutions and organizations recruit from a broad and diverse talent pool; lost opportunities for innovation and economic gain; and lost talent as a result of discrimination, unconscious bias, and sexual harassment.</p>
<p><i>Promising Practices for Addressing the Underrepresentation of Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine</i> reviews and synthesizes existing research on policies, practices, programs, and other interventions for improving the recruitment, retention, and sustained advancement into leadership roles of women in these disciplines. This report makes actionable recommendations to leverage change and drive swift, coordinated improvements to the systems of education, research, and employment in order to improve both the representation and leadership of women.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25585">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Integrity in Scientific Research Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10430"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2020:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10430#final</id>
    <published>2020-01-27T07:45:47-05:00</published>
    <updated>2020-01-27T07:46:15-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>"Most people say that it is the intellect which makes a great scientist. They are wrong: it is character." —Albert Einstein<br />
<br />
<i>Integrity in Scientific Research</i> attempts to define and describe those elements that encourage individuals involved with scientific research to act with integrity.<br />
<br />
Recognizing the inconsistency of human behavior, it stresses the important role that research institutions play in providing an integrity—rich environment, citing the need for institutions to provide staff with training and education, policies and procedures, and tools and support systems. It identifies practices that characterize integrity in such areas as peer review and research on human subjects and weighs the strengths and limitations of self—evaluation efforts by these institutions. In addition, it details an approach to promoting integrity during the education of researchers, including how to develop an effective curriculum. Providing a framework for research and educational institutions, this important book will be essential for anyone concerned about ethics in the scientific community.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10430">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/348'>Higher Education</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reproducibility and Replicability in Science</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25303"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2019:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25303#final</id>
    <published>2019-09-20T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2019-12-20T14:55:37-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>One of the pathways by which the scientific community confirms the validity of a new scientific discovery is by repeating the research that produced it. When a scientific effort fails to independently confirm the computations or results of a previous study, some fear that it may be a symptom of a lack of rigor in science, while others argue that such an observed inconsistency can be an important precursor to new discovery.</p>
<p>Concerns about reproducibility and replicability have been expressed in both scientific and popular media. As these concerns came to light, Congress requested that the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine conduct a study to assess the extent of issues related to reproducibility and replicability and to offer recommendations for improving rigor and transparency in scientific research.</p>
<p><i>Reproducibility and Replicability in Science</i> defines reproducibility and replicability and examines the factors that may lead to non-reproducibility and non-replicability in research. Unlike the typical expectation of reproducibility between two computations, expectations about replicability are more nuanced, and in some cases a lack of replicability can aid the process of scientific discovery. This report provides recommendations to researchers, academic institutions, journals, and funders on steps they can take to improve reproducibility and replicability in science.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25303">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/478'>Surveys and Statistics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/478'>Surveys and Statistics</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2018</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25503"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2019:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25503#final</id>
    <published>2019-07-02T10:45:23-04:00</published>
    <updated>2019-07-02T10:45:27-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>

<p>This Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2018. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25503">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Minority Serving Institutions America's Underutilized Resource for Strengthening the STEM Workforce</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25257"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2019:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25257#final</id>
    <published>2019-02-05T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2019-02-05T14:18:19-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>There are over 20 million young people of color in the United States whose representation in STEM education pathways and in the STEM workforce is still far below their numbers in the general population. Their participation could help re-establish the United States' preeminence in STEM innovation and productivity, while also increasing the number of well-educated STEM workers.</p> 

<p>There are nearly 700 minority-serving institutions (MSIs) that provide pathways to STEM educational success and workforce readiness for millions of students of color—and do so in a mission-driven and intentional manner. They vary substantially in their origins, missions, student demographics, and levels of institutional selectivity. But in general, their service to the nation provides a gateway to higher education and the workforce, particularly for underrepresented students of color and those from low-income and first-generation to college backgrounds. The challenge for the nation is how to capitalize on the unique strengths and attributes of these institutions and to equip them with the resources, exceptional faculty talent, and vital infrastructure needed to educate and train an increasingly critical portion of current and future generations of scientists, engineers, and health professionals.</p> 

<p><i>Minority Serving Institutions</i> examines the nation's MSIs and identifies promising programs and effective strategies that have the highest potential return on investment for the nation by increasing the quantity and quality MSI STEM graduates. This study also provides critical information and perspective about the importance of MSIs to other stakeholders in the nation's system of higher education and the organizations that support them.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25257">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/348'>Higher Education</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/350'>Math and Science Education</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/407'>Workforce and Labor Issues</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/347'>Engineering Education</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/351'>Medical Training and Workforce</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Open Science by Design Realizing a Vision for 21st Century Research</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25116"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2018:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25116#final</id>
    <published>2018-08-09T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2018-08-09T13:56:04-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Openness and sharing of information are fundamental to the progress of science and to the effective functioning of the research enterprise. The advent of scientific journals in the 17th century helped power the Scientific Revolution by allowing researchers to communicate across time and space, using the technologies of that era to generate reliable knowledge more quickly and efficiently. Harnessing today's stunning, ongoing advances in information technologies, the global research enterprise and its stakeholders are moving toward a new open science ecosystem. Open science aims to ensure the free availability and usability of scholarly publications, the data that result from scholarly research, and the methodologies, including code or algorithms, that were used to generate those data.</p>

<p><i>Open Science by Design</i> is aimed at overcoming barriers and moving toward open science as the default approach across the research enterprise. This report explores specific examples of open science and discusses a range of challenges, focusing on stakeholder perspectives. It is meant to provide guidance to the research enterprise and its stakeholders as they build strategies for achieving open science and take the next steps.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25116">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sexual Harassment of Women Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24994"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2018:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24994#final</id>
    <published>2018-08-01T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2018-08-01T12:19:43-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Over the last few decades, research, activity, and funding has been devoted to improving the recruitment, retention, and advancement of women in the fields of science, engineering, and medicine. In recent years the diversity of those participating in these fields, particularly the participation of women, has improved and there are significantly more women entering careers and studying science, engineering, and medicine than ever before. However, as women increasingly enter these fields they face biases and barriers and it is not surprising that sexual harassment is one of these barriers.</p>
<p>Over thirty years the incidence of sexual harassment in different industries has held steady, yet now more women are in the workforce and in academia, and in the fields of science, engineering, and medicine (as students and faculty) and so more women are experiencing sexual harassment as they work and learn. Over the last several years, revelations of the sexual harassment experienced by women in the workplace and in academic settings have raised urgent questions about the specific impact of this discriminatory behavior on women and the extent to which it is limiting their careers.</p>
<p><em>Sexual Harassment of Women</em> explores the influence of sexual harassment in academia on the career advancement of women in the scientific, technical, and medical workforce. This report reviews the research on the extent to which women in the fields of science, engineering, and medicine are victimized by sexual harassment and examines the existing information on the extent to which sexual harassment in academia negatively impacts the recruitment, retention, and advancement of women pursuing scientific, engineering, technical, and medical careers. It also identifies and analyzes the policies, strategies and practices that have been the most successful in preventing and addressing sexual harassment in these settings.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24994">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/309'>Women and Minorities</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2017</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25177"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2018:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25177#final</id>
    <published>2018-07-06T10:20:26-04:00</published>
    <updated>2018-07-06T10:55:03-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>
<p>This <i>Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences</i> presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2017. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25177">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Fostering Integrity in Research</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21896"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2017:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21896#final</id>
    <published>2017-12-13T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2017-12-15T09:25:52-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The integrity of knowledge that emerges from research is based on individual and collective adherence to core values of objectivity, honesty, openness, fairness, accountability, and stewardship. Integrity in science means that the organizations in which research is conducted encourage those involved to exemplify these values in every step of the research process. Understanding the dynamics that support – or distort – practices that uphold the integrity of research by all participants ensures that the research enterprise advances knowledge.</p>
<p>The 1992 report <i>Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process</i> evaluated issues related to scientific responsibility and the conduct of research. It provided a valuable service in describing and analyzing a very complicated set of issues, and has served as a crucial basis for thinking about research integrity for more than two decades. However, as experience has accumulated with various forms of research misconduct, detrimental research practices, and other forms of misconduct, as subsequent empirical research has revealed more about the nature of scientific misconduct, and because technological and social changes have altered the environment in which science is conducted, it is clear that the framework established more than two decades ago needs to be updated.</p>
<p><i>Responsible Science</i> served as a valuable benchmark to set the context for this most recent analysis and to help guide the committee's thought process. <i>Fostering Integrity in Research</i> identifies best practices in research and recommends practical options for discouraging and addressing research misconduct and detrimental research practices.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21896">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>An Assessment of ARPA-E Summary</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24811"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2017:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24811#final</id>
    <published>2017-08-03T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2017-08-03T11:30:23-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>In 2005, the National Research Council report <i>Rising Above the Gathering Storm</i> recommended a new way for the federal government to spur technological breakthroughs in the energy sector. It recommended the creation of a new agency, the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, or ARPA-E, as an adaptation of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) model—widely considered a successful experiment that has funded out-of-the-box, transformative research and engineering that made possible the Internet, GPS, and stealth aircraft. This new agency was envisioned as a means of tackling the nation's energy challenges in a way that could translate basic research into technological breakthroughs while also addressing economic, environmental, and security issues.</p> 

<p>Congress authorized ARPA-E in the 2007 America COMPETES Act and requested an early assessment following 6 years of operation to examine the agency's progress toward achieving its statutory mission and goals. This publication summarizes the results of that assessment.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24811">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2016</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24826"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2017:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24826#final</id>
    <published>2017-06-29T13:58:30-04:00</published>
    <updated>2017-07-12T13:36:10-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>

<p>This <i>Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences</i> presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2016. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24826">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Communicating Science Effectively A Research Agenda</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23674"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2017:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23674#final</id>
    <published>2017-03-08T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2017-04-13T15:56:48-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Science and technology are embedded in virtually every aspect of modern life. As a result, people face an increasing need to integrate information from science with their personal values and other considerations as they make important life decisions about medical care, the safety of foods, what to do about climate change, and many other issues. Communicating science effectively, however, is a complex task and an acquired skill. Moreover, the approaches to communicating science that will be most effective for specific audiences and circumstances are not obvious. Fortunately, there is an expanding science base from diverse disciplines that can support science communicators in making these determinations.</p>
<p><i>Communicating Science Effectively</i> offers a research agenda for science communicators and researchers seeking to apply this research and fill gaps in knowledge about how to communicate effectively about science, focusing in particular on issues that are contentious in the public sphere. To inform this research agenda, this publication identifies important influences – psychological, economic, political, social, cultural, and media-related – on how science related to such issues is understood, perceived, and used.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23674">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Optimizing the Nation's Investment in Academic Research A New Regulatory Framework for the 21st Century</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21824"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2016:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21824#final</id>
    <published>2016-06-29T12:19:43-04:00</published>
    <updated>2016-07-13T16:28:00-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Research universities are critical contributors to our national research enterprise. They are the principal source of a world-class labor force and fundamental discoveries that enhance our lives and the lives of others around the world. These institutions help to create an educated citizenry capable of making informed and crucial choices as participants in a democratic society. However many are concerned that the unintended cumulative effect of federal regulations undercuts the productivity of the research enterprise and diminishes the return on the federal investment in research.</p>
<p><i>Optimizing the Nation's Investment in Academic Research</i> reviews the regulatory framework as it currently exists, considers specific regulations that have placed undue and often unanticipated burdens on the research enterprise, and reassesses the process by which these regulations are created, reviewed, and retired. This review is critical to strengthen the partnership between the federal government and research institutions, to maximize the creation of new knowledge and products, to provide for the effective training and education of the next generation of scholars and workers, and to optimize the return on the federal investment in research for the benefit of the American people.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21824">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/348'>Higher Education</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2015</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23558"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2016:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23558#final</id>
    <published>2016-06-27T08:10:29-04:00</published>
    <updated>2016-06-27T08:10:52-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>
<p>This <i>Report of the Treasure of the National Academy of Sciences</i> presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2015. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23558">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Committee on Proposal Evaluation for Allocation of Supercomputing Time for the Study of Molecular Dynamics Sixth Round</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21817"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2015:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21817#final</id>
    <published>2015-11-16T11:14:27-05:00</published>
    <updated>2015-11-16T11:14:33-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This report describes the work of the Committee on Proposal Evaluation for Allocation of Supercomputing Time for the Study of Molecular Dynamics, Sixth Round. The committee evaluated submissions received in response to a Request for Proposals (RFP) for biomolecular simulation time on Anton, a supercomputer specially designed and built by D.E. Shaw Research (DESRES). Over the past five years, DESRES has made an Anton system housed at the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center (PSC) available to the non-commercial research community, based on the advice of previous National Research Council committees. As in prior rounds, the goal of the sixth RFP for simulation time on Anton is to continue to facilitate breakthrough research in the study of biomolecular systems by providing a massively parallel system specially designed for molecular dynamics simulations. The program seeks to continue to support research that addresses important and high impact questions demonstrating a clear need for Anton's special capabilities.</p>
<p><i>Report of the Committee on Proposal Evaluation for Allocation of Supercomputing Time for the Study of Molecular Dynamics, Sixth Round</i> is the report of the committee's evaluation of proposals based on scientific merit, justification for requested time allocation, and investigator qualifications and past accomplishments. This report identifies the proposals that best met the selection criteria.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21817">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/19007"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2015:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/19007#final</id>
    <published>2015-07-15T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2016-04-04T11:34:53-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The past half-century has witnessed a dramatic increase in the scale and complexity of scientific research. The growing scale of science has been accompanied by a shift toward collaborative research, referred to as "team science." Scientific research is increasingly conducted by small teams and larger groups rather than individual investigators, but the challenges of collaboration can slow these teams' progress in achieving their scientific goals. How does a team-based approach work, and how can universities and research institutions support teams?</p>
<p><i>Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science</i> synthesizes and integrates the available research to provide guidance on assembling the science team; leadership, education and professional development for science teams and groups. It also examines institutional and organizational structures and policies to support science teams and identifies areas where further research is needed to help science teams and groups achieve their scientific and translational goals. This report offers major public policy recommendations for science research agencies and policymakers, as well as recommendations for individual scientists, disciplinary associations, and research universities. <i>Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science</i> will be of interest to university research administrators, team science leaders, science faculty, and graduate and postdoctoral students.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/19007">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/404'>Human Systems and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/348'>Higher Education</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2014</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21779"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2015:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21779#final</id>
    <published>2015-07-09T15:46:21-04:00</published>
    <updated>2015-07-09T15:46:36-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>
<p>This <i>Report of the Treasure of the National Academy of Sciences</i> presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2014. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors.</p>
        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21779">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Postdoctoral Experience Revisited</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18982"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2014:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18982#final</id>
    <published>2014-12-10T10:45:01-05:00</published>
    <updated>2014-12-10T10:45:42-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p><i>The Postdoctoral Experience Revisited</i> builds on the 2000 report <i>Enhancing the Postdoctoral Experience for Scientists and Engineers</i>. That ground-breaking report assessed the postdoctoral experience and provided principles, action points, and recommendations to enhance that experience. Since the publication of the 2000 report, the postdoctoral landscape has changed considerably. The percentage of PhDs who pursue postdoctoral training is growing steadily and spreading from the biomedical and physical sciences to engineering and the social sciences. The average length of time spent in postdoctoral positions seems to be increasing. <i>The Postdoctoral Experience Revisited</i> reexamines postdoctoral programs in the United States, focusing on how postdocs are being guided and managed, how institutional practices have changed, and what happens to postdocs after they complete their programs. This book explores important changes that have occurred in postdoctoral practices and the research ecosystem and assesses how well current practices meet the needs of these fledgling scientists and engineers and of the research enterprise.</p>
<p><i>The Postdoctoral Experience Revisited</i> takes a fresh look at current postdoctoral fellows - how many there are, where they are working, in what fields, and for how many years. This book makes recommendations to improve aspects of programs - postdoctoral period of service, title and role, career development, compensation and benefits, and mentoring. Current data on demographics, career aspirations, and career outcomes for postdocs are limited. This report makes the case for better data collection by research institution and data sharing.</p>
<p>A larger goal of this study is not only to propose ways to make the postdoctoral system better for the postdoctoral researchers themselves but also to better understand the role that postdoctoral training plays in the research enterprise. It is also to ask whether there are alternative ways to satisfy some of the research and career development needs of postdoctoral researchers that are now being met with several years of advanced training. Postdoctoral researchers are the future of the research enterprise. The discussion and recommendations of <i>The Postdoctoral Experience Revisited</i> will stimulate action toward clarifying the role of postdoctoral researchers and improving their status and experience.</p>         <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18982">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Furthering America's Research Enterprise</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18804"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2014:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18804#final</id>
    <published>2014-10-28T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2014-10-29T08:47:07-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Scientific research has enabled America to remain at the forefront of global competition for commercially viable technologies and other innovations. For more than 65 years, the United States has led the world in science and technology. Discoveries from scientific research have extended our understanding of the physical and natural world, the cosmos, society, and of humans - their minds, bodies, and economic and other social interactions. Through these discoveries, science has enabled longer and healthier lives, provided for a better-educated citizenry, enhanced the national economy, and strengthened America's position in the global economy. At a time of budget stringency, how can we foster scientific innovation to ensure America's unprecedented prosperity, security, and quality of life?</p>
<p>Although many studies have investigated the impacts of research on society, <i>Furthering America's Research Enterprise</i> brings to bear a fresh approach informed by a more holistic understanding of the research enterprise as a complex, dynamic system. This understanding illuminates why America's research enterprise has historically been so successful; where attention should be focused to increase the societal benefits of research investments; and how those who make decisions on the allocation of funds for scientific research can best carry out their task.</p>
<p>This report will be of special interest to policy makers who support or manage the research enterprise, to others in public and private institutions who fund research, to scholars of the research enterprise, and to scientists and engineers who seek to better understand the many pathways through which their research benefits society.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18804">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Safe Science Promoting a Culture of Safety in Academic Chemical Research</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18706"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2014:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18706#final</id>
    <published>2014-10-08T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2014-10-08T17:31:00-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Recent serious and sometimes fatal accidents in chemical research laboratories at United States universities have driven government agencies, professional societies, industries, and universities themselves to examine the culture of safety in research laboratories. These incidents have triggered a broader discussion of how serious incidents can be prevented in the future and how best to train researchers and emergency personnel to respond appropriately when incidents do occur. As the priority placed on safety increases, many institutions have expressed a desire to go beyond simple compliance with regulations to work toward fostering a strong, positive safety culture: affirming a constant commitment to safety throughout their institutions, while integrating safety as an essential element in the daily work of laboratory researchers.</p>
<p><i>Safe Science</i> takes on this challenge. This report examines the culture of safety in research institutions and makes recommendations for university leadership, laboratory researchers, and environmental health and safety professionals to support safety as a core value of their institutions. The report discusses ways to fulfill that commitment through prioritizing funding for safety equipment and training, as well as making safety an ongoing operational priority.</p>
<p>A strong, positive safety culture arises not because of a set of rules but because of a constant commitment to safety throughout an organization. Such a culture supports the free exchange of safety information, emphasizes learning and improvement, and assigns greater importance to solving problems than to placing blame. High importance is assigned to safety at all times, not just when it is convenient or does not threaten personal or institutional productivity goals. <i>Safe Science</i> will be a guide to make the changes needed at all levels to protect students, researchers, and staff.</p>         <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18706">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/290'>Math, Chemistry, and Physics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/409'>Chemistry</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/472'>Biosecurity</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2013</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18830"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2014:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18830#final</id>
    <published>2014-07-01T11:11:25-04:00</published>
    <updated>2014-07-01T11:11:34-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Research Council (NRC), and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>
<p>This Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2013. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18830">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Convergence Facilitating Transdisciplinary Integration of Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, Engineering, and Beyond</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18722"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2014:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18722#final</id>
    <published>2014-06-16T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2014-06-17T10:52:54-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p><em>Convergence</em> discusses details of current programs in convergence of the life sciences with other STEM fields, how organizations have chosen to measure success, and what has worked and not worked in varied settings.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18722">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Trends in the Innovation Ecosystem Can Past Successes Help Inform Future Strategies? Summary of Two Workshops</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18509"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2013:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18509#final</id>
    <published>2013-09-10T10:54:44-04:00</published>
    <updated>2016-06-30T16:22:46-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Innovation has been a major engine of American economic and societal progress. It has increased per capita income more than sevenfold since the 19th century, has added three decades to the average lifespan, has revolutionized the way we communicate and share information, and has made the United States the strongest military power in the world. Without its historical leadership in innovation, the United States would be a very different country than it is today.</p>
<p><i>Trends in the Innovation Ecosystem</i> is the summary of two workshops hosted by the Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP) of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine in February and May, 2013. Experts from industry, academia, and finance met to discuss the challenges involved in innovation pathways. Both workshops focused on the interactions between research universities and industry and the concept of innovation as a "culture" as opposed to an operational method. The goal was to gain a better understanding of what key factors contributed to successful innovations in the past, how today's environment might necessitate changes in strategy, and what changes are likely to occur in the future in the context of a global innovation ecosystem. This report discusses the state of innovation in America, obstacles to both innovation and to reaping the benefits of innovation, and ways of overcoming those obstacles.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18509">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/284'>Engineering and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/365'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2012</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18388"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2013:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18388#final</id>
    <published>2013-07-02T11:21:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2013-07-02T11:25:01-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p> The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Research Council (NRC), and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>
<p>This Report of the Treasure of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2012. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18388">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Disaster Resilience A National Imperative</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13457"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2012:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13457#final</id>
    <published>2012-11-29T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2017-04-21T16:01:59-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>No person or place is immune from disasters or disaster-related losses. Infectious disease outbreaks, acts of terrorism, social unrest, or financial disasters in addition to natural hazards can all lead to large-scale consequences for the nation and its communities. Communities and the nation thus face difficult fiscal, social, cultural, and environmental choices about the best ways to ensure basic security and quality of life against hazards, deliberate attacks, and disasters. Beyond the unquantifiable costs of injury and loss of life from disasters, statistics for 2011 alone indicate economic damages from natural disasters in the United States exceeded $55 billion, with 14 events costing more than a billion dollars in damages each.</p>
<p>One way to reduce the impacts of disasters on the nation and its communities is to invest in enhancing resilience—the ability to prepare and plan for, absorb, recover from and more successfully adapt to adverse events. <i>Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative</i> addresses the broad issue of increasing the nation's resilience to disasters. This book defines "national resilience", describes the state of knowledge about resilience to hazards and disasters, and frames the main issues related to increasing resilience in the United States. It also provide goals, baseline conditions, or performance metrics for national resilience and outlines additional information, data, gaps, and/or obstacles that need to be addressed to increase the nation's resilience to disasters. Additionally, the book's authoring committee makes recommendations about the necessary approaches to elevate national resilience to disasters in the United States.</p>
<p>Enhanced resilience allows better anticipation of disasters and better planning to reduce disaster losses-rather than waiting for an event to occur and paying for it afterward. <i>Disaster Resilience</i> confronts the topic of how to increase the nation's resilience to disasters through a vision of the characteristics of a resilient nation in the year 2030. Increasing disaster resilience is an imperative that requires the collective will of the nation and its communities. Although disasters will continue to occur, actions that move the nation from reactive approaches to disasters to a proactive stance where communities actively engage in enhancing resilience will reduce many of the broad societal and economic burdens that disasters can cause.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13457">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/281'>Earth Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/332'>Earthquakes, Floods and Natural Disasters</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/470'>Disaster Response</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Science for Environmental Protection The Road Ahead</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13510"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2012:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13510#final</id>
    <published>2012-11-21T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2023-03-20T14:16:10-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>In anticipation of future environmental science and engineering challenges and technologic advances, EPA asked the National Research Council (NRC) to assess the overall capabilities of the agency to develop, obtain, and use the best available scientific and technologic information and tools to meet persistent, emerging, and future mission challenges and opportunities. Although the committee cannot predict with certainty what new environmental problems EPA will face in the next 10 years or more, it worked to identify some of the common drivers and common characteristics of problems that are likely to occur.</p>
<p>Tensions inherent to the structure of EPA's work contribute to the current and persistent challenges faced by the agency, and meeting those challenges will require development of leading-edge scientific methods, tools, and technologies, and a more deliberate approach to systems thinking and interdisciplinary science. <em>Science for Environmental Protection: The Road Ahead</em> outlines a framework for building science for environmental protection in the 21st century and identified key areas where enhanced leadership and capacity can strengthen the agency's abilities to address current and emerging environmental challenges as well as take advantage of new tools and technologies to address them. The foundation of EPA science is strong, but the agency needs to continue to address numerous present and future challenges if it is to maintain its science leadership and meet its expanding mandates.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13510">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/285'>Environment and Environmental Studies</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/371'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/281'>Earth Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/337'>Natural Resources and Conservation</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/285'>Environment and Environmental Studies</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/372'>Pollutants and Toxics</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Review of the US/USSR Agreement on Cooperation in the Fields of Science and Technology</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13528"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2012:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13528#final</id>
    <published>2012-09-25T13:31:18-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-09-25T14:40:19-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>May 24, 1977, marks the expiration date or the five-year U.S./U.S.S.R. Agreement on Cooperation in the Fields of Science and Technology (S&T). This study is the response of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) to a March 28, 1977, request by Dr. Frank Press, President Carter's Science Adviser and Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTOP), for assistance in evaluating the benefits from this Agreement and in establishing the form of the renewal. <em>Review of the US/USSR Agreement on Cooperation in the Fields of Science and Technology </em>examines this study.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13528">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2011</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13445"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2012:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13445#final</id>
    <published>2012-07-11T10:52:33-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-07-11T10:54:25-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p> The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Research Council (NRC), and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>
<p>This Report of the Treasure of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2011. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13445">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A View of Global S&amp;T Based on Activities of the Board on Global Science and Technology Letter Report</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13309"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2011:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13309#final</id>
    <published>2011-12-07T10:45:01-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-12-07T12:15:59-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This letter report describes the 2009-2011 activities of the Board on Global Science and Technology (BGST) and provides an initial characterization of the global science and technology landscape that the Board can use as a roadmap to develop future activities. BGST met five times between November 2009 and May 2011. Board meetings were devoted to (1) identifying national security implications of the globalization of S&T, (2) building a baseline understanding of current indicators for the U.S. posture with regard to the evolving global S&T landscape, and (3) developing a BGST engagement strategy. The letter portion of the report summarizes activities of the board in its first year, and also describes some existing approaches to identifying and/or benchmarking emerging technologies globally. It is followed by 5 appendixes which include three experimental examples of a qualitative approach to benchmarking, and brief descriptions of programs that are part of the National Academies complex, with which BGST has cooperated.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13309">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/290'>Math, Chemistry, and Physics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/409'>Chemistry</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence Third Edition</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13163"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2011:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13163#final</id>
    <published>2011-09-28T09:45:42-04:00</published>
    <updated>2017-04-07T12:25:04-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p><i>The Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, Third Edition</i>, assists judges in managing cases involving complex scientific and technical evidence by describing the basic tenets of key scientific fields from which legal evidence is typically derived and by providing examples of cases in which that evidence has been used.</p>
<p>First published in 1994 by the Federal Judicial Center, the <i>Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence</i> has been relied upon in the legal and academic communities and is often cited by various courts and others. Judges faced with disputes over the admissibility of scientific and technical evidence refer to the manual to help them better understand and evaluate the relevance, reliability and usefulness of the evidence being proffered. The manual is not intended to tell judges what is good science and what is not. Instead, it serves to help judges identify issues on which experts are likely to differ and to guide the inquiry of the court in seeking an informed resolution of the conflict.</p>
<p>The core of the manual consists of a series of chapters (reference guides) on various scientific topics, each authored by an expert in that field. The topics have been chosen by an oversight committee because of their complexity and frequency in litigation. Each chapter is intended to provide a general overview of the topic in lay terms, identifying issues that will be useful to judges and others in the legal profession. They are written for a non-technical audience and are not intended as exhaustive presentations of the topic. Rather, the chapters seek to provide judges with the basic information in an area of science, to allow them to have an informed conversation with the experts and attorneys.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13163">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/278'>Biology and Life Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/315'>Genetics</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/306'>Law and Justice</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation America's Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12984"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2011:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12984#final</id>
    <published>2011-06-29T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-07-01T13:22:26-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>In order for the United States to maintain the global leadership and competitiveness in science and technology that are critical to achieving national goals, we must invest in research, encourage innovation, and grow a strong and talented science and technology workforce. <em>Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation </em>explores the role of diversity in the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) workforce and its value in keeping America innovative and competitive. According to the book, the U.S. labor market is projected to grow faster in science and engineering than in any other sector in the coming years, making minority participation in STEM education at all levels a national priority.</p>
<p><em>Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation </em>analyzes the rate of change and the challenges the nation currently faces in developing a strong and diverse workforce. Although minorities are the fastest growing segment of the population, they are underrepresented in the fields of science and engineering. Historically, there has been a strong connection between increasing educational attainment in the United States and the growth in and global leadership of the economy. Expanding <em>Underrepresented Minority Participation </em>suggests that the federal government, industry, and post-secondary institutions work collaboratively with K-12 schools and school systems to increase minority access to and demand for post-secondary STEM education and technical training.</p>
<p>The book also identifies best practices and offers a comprehensive road map for increasing involvement of underrepresented minorities and improving the quality of their education. It offers recommendations that focus on academic and social support, institutional roles, teacher preparation, affordability and program development.</p>
<p><br />
 </p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12984">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/350'>Math and Science Education</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/284'>Engineering and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/362'>Engineering Education</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/290'>Math, Chemistry, and Physics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/412'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/407'>Workforce and Labor Issues</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/347'>Engineering Education</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2010</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13190"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2011:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13190#final</id>
    <published>2011-06-23T16:01:26-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-23T16:01:35-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The income that supports the activities of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) comes from two major sources: program revenue received from sponsors to pay for the myriad studies and other activities undertaken each year by the National Research Council (NRC), and a much smaller sum that is obtained from our endowment under the endowment spending policies adopted by the Council. The goal of the endowment is to provide stable support for the Academy's programs and activities. To achieve this goal, the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Finance Committee, has historically authorized spending from the portfolio at a rate designed to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment over time.</p>
<p>This Report of the Treasure of the National Academy of Sciences presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments portfolio activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2010. While this book provides essential financial summary to key personnel, it also serves as a vital informative resource for various members of the public, private, and governmental sectors.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13190">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rising Above the Gathering Storm Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11463"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2011:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11463#final</id>
    <published>2011-05-09T11:53:25-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-05-12T16:52:38-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        In a world where advanced knowledge is widespread and low-cost labor is readily available, U.S. advantages in the marketplace and in science and technology have begun to erode. A comprehensive and coordinated federal effort is urgently needed to bolster U.S. competitiveness and pre-eminence in these areas. This congressionally requested report by a pre-eminent committee makes four recommendations along with 20 implementation actions that federal policy-makers should take to create high-quality jobs and focus new science and technology efforts on meeting the nation's needs, especially in the area of clean, affordable energy:
<br><br>
1) Increase America's talent pool by vastly improving K-12 mathematics and science education; 
<br>
2) Sustain and strengthen the nation's commitment to long-term basic research;
<br>
3) Develop, recruit, and retain top students, scientists, and engineers from both the U.S. and abroad; and
<br>
4) Ensure that the United States is the premier place in the world for innovation. 
<br>
<br>
Some actions will involve changing existing laws, while others will require financial support that would come from reallocating existing budgets or increasing them. <i>Rising Above the Gathering Storm</i> will be of great interest to federal and state government agencies, educators and schools, public decision makers, research sponsors, regulatory analysts, and scholars.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11463">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/304'>Economics</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/352'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/284'>Engineering and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/365'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/407'>Workforce and Labor Issues</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited Rapidly Approaching Category 5: Condensed Version</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13151"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2011:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13151#final</id>
    <published>2011-04-18T14:08:32-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-04-18T14:08:37-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>In 2005 the National Academies<span style="font-style: italic;"> </span>released <em>Rising Above the Gathering Storm</em>, a book focused on the ability of all Americans to compete for quality jobs in the evolving global economy. <em>Rising Above the Gathering Storm</em> concluded that a primary driver of the future economy and concomitant creation of jobs in the 21st century will be innovation, largely derived from advances in science and engineering. It proposed four overarching recommendations, underpinned by 20 specific implementing actions. The America COMPETES Act approved many of the recommendations set forth in <em>Rising Above the Gathering Storm</em>. </p>
<p>In 2010, the National Academies released <em>Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited</em>, an updated volume that outlines the work of the government and the private sector in the past five years. This volume also presents a series of thought-provoking factoids about the state of science and innovation in America. It asserts that the 20 actions previously endorsed should be fully implemented. </p>
<p>This report is a condensed version of <em>Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited</em>.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13151">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/'></a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/'></a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/284'>Engineering and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/'></a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Global Technology Changes and Implications: Summary of a Forum</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13073"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2011:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13073#final</id>
    <published>2011-01-25T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-01-25T17:18:45-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Engineers know what they mean by the word <em>technology</em>. They mean the things engineers conceive, design, build, and deploy. But what does the word <em>global </em>in the phrase <em>global technology</em> mean? Does it mean finding a way to feed, clothe, house, and otherwise serve the 9 billion people who will soon live on the planet? Does it mean competing with companies around the world to build and sell products and services? On a more immediate and practical level, can the rise of global technology be expected to create or destroy U.S. jobs?</p>
<p>The National Academy of Engineering held a three-hour forum exploring these and related questions. The forum brought together seven prominent members of the engineering community:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Esko Aho, Executive Vice President of Corporate Relations and Responsibility, Nokia; former Prime Minister of Finland</li>
    <li>Bernard Amadei, Founder, Engineers Without Borders, Professor, University of Colorado</li>
    <li>John Seely Brown, Visiting Professor, University of Southern California; Former Chief Scientist of Xerox Corporation</li>
    <li>Ruth A. David, President and CEO of Analytic Services, Inc.</li>
    <li>Eric C. Haseltine, Consultant, former Associate Director for Science and Technology in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and former head of research and development at Disney Imagineering</li>
    <li>Nicholas Negroponte, Founder, One Laptop Per Child Association Inc., Founder and Chairman Emeritus of the MIT Media Lab</li>
    <li>Raymond S. Stata, Co-founder and Chairman of the Board, Analog Devices Inc.</li>
</ul>
<p>In the first half of the forum, each panelist explored a specific dimension of the global spread of technology. The topics varied widely—from reducing poverty to the impact of young people on technology to the need for systems thinking in engineering. But all seven presenters foresaw a world in which engineering will be fundamentally different from what it has been. In the second half of the forum, the panelists discussed a variety of issues raised by moderator Charles Vest and by forum attendees.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13073">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/406'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited Rapidly Approaching Category 5</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12999"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2010:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12999#final</id>
    <published>2010-09-23T13:45:01-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-01-14T12:41:37-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>In the face of so many daunting near-term challenges, U.S. government and industry are letting the crucial strategic issues of U.S. competitiveness slip below the surface. Five years ago, the National Academies prepared <i>Rising Above the Gathering Storm</i>, a book that cautioned: "Without a renewed effort to bolster the foundations of our competitiveness, we can expect to lose our privileged position." Since that time we find ourselves in a country where much has changed—and a great deal has not changed.</p>
<p>So where <i>does</i> America stand relative to its position of five years ago when the <i>Gathering Storm</i> book was prepared? The unanimous view of the authors is that our nation's outlook has worsened. The present volume, <i>Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited</i>, explores the tipping point America now faces. Addressing America's competitiveness challenge will require many years if not decades; however, the requisite federal funding of much of that effort is about to terminate.</p>
<p><i>Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited</i> provides a snapshot of the work of the government and the private sector in the past five years, analyzing how the original recommendations have or have not been acted upon, what consequences this may have on future competitiveness, and priorities going forward. In addition, readers will find a series of thought- and discussion-provoking factoids—many of them alarming—about the state of science and innovation in America.</p>
<p><i>Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited</i> is a wake-up call. To reverse the foreboding outlook will require a sustained commitment by both individual citizens and government officials—at all levels. This book, together with the original <i>Gathering Storm</i> volume, provides the roadmap to meet that goal. While this book is essential for policy makers, anyone concerned with the future of innovation, competitiveness, and the standard of living in the United States will find this book an ideal tool for engaging their government representatives, peers, and community about this momentous issue.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12999">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/345'>Education Research and Theory</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/284'>Engineering and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/365'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/304'>Economics</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2009</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12936"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2010:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12936#final</id>
    <published>2010-06-16T16:30:39-04:00</published>
    <updated>2010-06-16T16:30:39-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This <em>Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences</em> presents the financial position and results of operations, as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments pool activities of the Academy for the year ended December 31, 2009.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12936">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Private-Public Sector Collaboration to Enhance Community Disaster Resilience A Workshop Report</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12864"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2010:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12864#final</id>
    <published>2010-02-23T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2010-02-22T09:45:01-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 (9/11) on the United States prompted a rethinking of how the United States prepares for disasters. Federal policy documents written since 9/11 have stressed that the private and public sectors share equal responsibility for the security of the nation's critical infrastructure and key assets. Private sector entities have a role in the safety, security, and resilience of the communities in which they operate. Incentivizing the private sector to expend resources on community efforts remains challenging. Disasters in the United States since 9/11 (e.g., Hurricane Katrina in 2005) indicate that the nation has not yet been successful in making its communities resilient to disaster.<br />
<br />
In this book, the National Research Council assesses the current states of the art and practice in private-public sector collaboration dedicated to strengthening community disaster resilience.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12864">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/281'>Earth Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/332'>Earthquakes, Floods and Natural Disasters</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/470'>Disaster Response</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ensuring the Integrity, Accessibility, and Stewardship of Research Data in the Digital Age</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12615"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2009:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12615#final</id>
    <published>2009-11-17T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-07-30T14:17:18-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>As digital technologies are expanding the power and reach of research, they are also raising complex issues. These include complications in ensuring the validity of research data; standards that do not keep pace with the high rate of innovation; restrictions on data sharing that reduce the ability of researchers to verify results and build on previous research; and huge increases in the amount of data being generated, creating severe challenges in preserving that data for long-term use.</p>
<p>Ensuring the Integrity, Accessibility, and Stewardship of Research Data in the Digital Age examines the consequences of the changes affecting research data with respect to three issues - integrity, accessibility, and stewardship-and finds a need for a new approach to the design and the management of research projects. The report recommends that all researchers receive appropriate training in the management of research data, and calls on researchers to make all research data, methods, and other information underlying results publicly accessible in a timely manner. The book also sees the stewardship of research data as a critical long-term task for the research enterprise and its stakeholders. Individual researchers, research institutions, research sponsors, professional societies, and journals involved in scientific, engineering, and medical research will find this book an essential guide to the principles affecting research data in the digital age.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12615">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/279'>Computers and Information Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/323'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/348'>Higher Education</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States A Path Forward</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12589"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2009:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12589#final</id>
    <published>2009-07-29T15:47:32-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-07-29T15:47:32-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Scores of talented and dedicated people serve the forensic science community, performing vitally important work. However, they are often constrained by lack of adequate resources, sound policies, and national support. It is clear that change and advancements, both systematic and scientific, are needed in a number of forensic science disciplines to ensure the reliability of work, establish enforceable standards, and promote best practices with consistent application. <em>Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward</em> provides a detailed plan for addressing these needs and suggests the creation of a new government entity, the National Institute of Forensic Science, to establish and enforce standards within the forensic science community.</p>
<p>The benefits of improving and regulating the forensic science disciplines are clear: assisting law enforcement officials, enhancing homeland security, and reducing the risk of wrongful conviction and exoneration. <em>Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States</em> gives a full account of what is needed to advance the forensic science disciplines, including upgrading of systems and organizational structures, better training, widespread adoption of uniform and enforceable best practices, and mandatory certification and accreditation programs.</p>
<p>While this book provides an essential call-to-action for congress and policy makers, it also serves as a vital tool for law enforcement agencies, criminal prosecutors and attorneys, and forensic science educators.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12589">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/306'>Law and Justice</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Survey of Attitudes and Actions on Dual Use Research in the Life Sciences A Collaborative Effort of the National Research Council and the American Association for the Advancement of Science</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12460"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2009:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12460#final</id>
    <published>2009-07-14T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-02-05T10:45:01-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The same technologies that fuel scientific advances also pose potential risks—that the knowledge, tools, and techniques gained through legitimate biotechnology research could be misused to create biological weapons or for bioterrorism. This is often called the dual use dilemma of the life sciences. Yet even research with the greatest potential for misuse may offer significant benefits. Determining how to constrain the danger without harming essential scientific research is critical for national security as well as prosperity and well-being.</p>
<p>This book discusses a 2007 survey of American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) members in the life sciences about their knowledge of dual use issues and attitudes about their responsibilities to help mitigate the risks of misuse of their research.</p>
<p>Overall, the results suggest that there may be considerable support for approaches to oversight that rely on measures that are developed and implemented by the scientific community itself. The responses also suggest that there is a need to clarify the scope of research activities of concern and to provide guidance about what actions scientists can take to reduce the risk that their research will be misused by those with malicious intent.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12460">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/278'>Biology and Life Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/317'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/327'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/328'>Prevention, Security and Response</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/472'>Biosecurity</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer for the Year Ended December 31, 2008</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12686"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2009:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12686#final</id>
    <published>2009-06-16T15:46:33-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-06-16T15:46:33-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This <em>Report of the Treasurer of the National Academy of Sciences</em> presents the financial position and results of operations, as well as a review of the endowment, trust, and other long-term investments pool activities of the Academy for the year ended December 31, 2008. </p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12686">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Beyond 'Fortress America' National Security Controls on Science and Technology in a Globalized World</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12567"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2009:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12567#final</id>
    <published>2009-04-30T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-01-08T13:45:01-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The national security controls that regulate access to and export of science and technology are broken. As currently structured, many of these controls undermine our national and homeland security and stifle American engagement in the global economy, and in science and technology. These unintended consequences arise from policies that were crafted for an earlier era. In the name of maintaining superiority, the U.S. now runs the risk of becoming less secure, less competitive and less prosperous. <br />
<br />
<em>Beyond "Fortress America"</em> provides an account of the costs associated with building walls that hamper our access to global science and technology that dampen our economic potential. The book also makes recommendations to reform the export control process, ensure scientific and technological competitiveness, and improve the non-immigrant visa system that regulates entry into the United States of foreign science and engineering students, scholars, and professionals. <br />
<br />
<em>Beyond "Fortress America" </em>contains vital information and action items for the President and policy makers that will affect the United States' ability to compete globally. Interested parties—including military personnel, engineers, scientists, professionals, industrialists, and scholars—will find this book a valuable tool for stemming a serious decline affecting broad areas of the nation's security and economy. <br />
<br />
 </p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12567">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/327'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>On Being a Scientist A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research: Third Edition</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12192"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2009:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12192#final</id>
    <published>2009-03-27T10:45:01-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-03-27T10:45:01-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The scientific research enterprise is built on a foundation of trust. Scientists trust that the results reported by others are valid. Society trusts that the results of research reflect an honest attempt by scientists to describe the world accurately and without bias. But this trust will endure only if the scientific community devotes itself to exemplifying and transmitting the values associated with ethical scientific conduct.<br />
<br />
<i>On Being a Scientist</i> was designed to supplement the informal lessons in ethics provided by research supervisors and mentors. The book describes the ethical foundations of scientific practices and some of the personal and professional issues that researchers encounter in their work. It applies to all forms of research—whether in academic, industrial, or governmental settings-and to all scientific disciplines. <br />
<br />
This third edition of <i>On Being a Scientist</i> reflects developments since the publication of the original edition in 1989 and a second edition in 1995. A continuing feature of this edition is the inclusion of a number of hypothetical scenarios offering guidance in thinking about and discussing these scenarios.<br />
<br />
<i>On Being a Scientist</i> is aimed primarily at graduate students and beginning researchers, but its lessons apply to all scientists at all stages of their scientific careers.<br />
 </p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12192">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/348'>Higher Education</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/307'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/286'>Explore Science</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/286'>Explore Science</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Science and Decisions Advancing Risk Assessment</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12209"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2009:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12209#final</id>
    <published>2009-02-24T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-12-03T10:45:01-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Risk assessment has become a dominant public policy tool for making choices, based on limited resources, to protect public health and the environment. It has been instrumental to the mission of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as well as other federal agencies in evaluating public health concerns, informing regulatory and technological decisions, prioritizing research needs and funding, and in developing approaches for cost-benefit analysis.</p>
<p>However, risk assessment is at a crossroads. Despite advances in the field, risk assessment faces a number of significant challenges including lengthy delays in making complex decisions; lack of data leading to significant uncertainty in risk assessments; and many chemicals in the marketplace that have not been evaluated and emerging agents requiring assessment.</p>
<p><i>Science and Decisions</i> makes practical scientific and technical recommendations to address these challenges. This book is a complement to the widely used 1983 National Academies book, Risk Assessment in the Federal Government (also known as the Red Book). The earlier book established a framework for the concepts and conduct of risk assessment that has been adopted by numerous expert committees, regulatory agencies, and public health institutions. The new book embeds these concepts within a broader framework for risk-based decision-making. Together, these are essential references for those working in the regulatory and public health fields.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12209">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/288'>Health and Medicine</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/399'>Public Health and Prevention</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/285'>Environment and Environmental Studies</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/371'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Fifteenth Interim Report of the Committee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12442"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2008:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12442#final</id>
    <published>2008-07-16T09:45:01-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-07-16T09:45:01-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        Extremely hazardous substances (EHSs) can be released accidentally as a result of chemical spills, industrial explosions, fires, or accidents involving railroad cars or trucks transporting EHSs or intentionally through terrorist activities. These substances can also be released by improper storage or handling. Workers and residents in communities surrounding industrial facilities where EHSs are manufactured, used, or stored and in communities along the nation's railways and highways are potentially at risk of being exposed to airborne EHSs during accidental or intentional releases. 
<p>In 1993, the National Advisory Committee was tasked with developing acute exposure guideline levels (AEGLs) for approximately 200 EHSs. This book is the fifteenth interim report from that committee. It summarizes the committee's conclusions and recommendations for improving documents for 16 chemicals and one chemical mixture identified as EHSs. The report also summarizes the committee's conclusions and recommendations for improving a draft white paper that proposes standard operating procedures for using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling as a tool in the AEGLs development program.
</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12442">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/290'>Math, Chemistry, and Physics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/409'>Chemistry</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/290'>Math, Chemistry, and Physics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/412'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Workshop Series on Issues in Space Science and Technology Summary of Space and Earth Science Issues from the Workshop on U.S. Civil Space Policy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12156"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2008:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12156#final</id>
    <published>2008-02-11T09:45:02-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-02-11T09:45:02-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        NASA has asked the Space Studies Board (SSB) of the NRC to examine issues related to space science and technology through a series of three workshops. The first of these was held in November 2007 in conjunction with another workshop being held jointly by the SSB and ASEB to assess U.S. civil space policy broadly. Some of the workshop sessions focused more than others on issues of interest to NASA's Science Mission Directorate (SMD). This book concentrates on those sessions and presents a summary of the views of the participants on the issues that are relevant to SMD. A separate book will be prepared on the full range of issues about U.S. civil space policy discussed at the workshop.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12156">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/293'>Space and Aeronautics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/418'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>International Benchmarking of U.S. Chemical Engineering Research Competitiveness</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11867"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2007:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11867#final</id>
    <published>2007-07-12T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        More than $400 billion worth of products rely on innovations in chemistry. Chemical engineering, as an academic discipline and profession, has enabled this achievement. In response to growing concerns about the future of the discipline, <i>International Benchmarking of U.S. Chemical Engineering Research Competitiveness</i> gauges the standing of the U.S. chemical engineering enterprise in the world. 
<p>
This in-depth benchmarking analysis is based on measures including numbers of published papers, citations, trends in degrees conferred, patent productivity, and awards. The book concludes that the United States is presently, and is expected to remain, among the world's leaders in all subareas of chemical engineering research. However, U.S. leadership in some classical and emerging subareas will be strongly challenged. 
<p>
This critical analysis will be of interest to practicing chemical engineers, professors and students in the discipline, economists, policy makers, major research university administrators, and executives in industries dependent upon innovations in chemistry.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11867">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/290'>Math, Chemistry, and Physics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/409'>Chemistry</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/284'>Engineering and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/365'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Beyond Bias and Barriers Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11741"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2007:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11741#final</id>
    <published>2007-05-04T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        The United States economy relies on the productivity, entrepreneurship, and creativity of its people. To maintain its scientific and engineering leadership amid increasing economic and educational globalization, the United States must aggressively pursue the innovative capacity of all its people—women and men. However, women face barriers to success in every field of science and engineering; obstacles that deprive the country of an important source of talent. Without a transformation of academic institutions to tackle such barriers, the future vitality of the U.S. research base and economy are in jeopardy. 
<p>
<i>Beyond Bias and Barriers</i> explains that eliminating gender bias in academia requires immediate overarching reform, including decisive action by university administrators, professional societies, federal funding agencies and foundations, government agencies, and Congress. If implemented and coordinated across public, private, and government sectors, the recommended actions will help to improve workplace environments for all employees while strengthening the foundations of America's competitiveness. 
        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11741">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/309'>Women and Minorities</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/348'>Higher Education</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ethical Considerations for Research Involving Prisoners</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11692"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2007:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11692#final</id>
    <published>2007-01-22T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2014-05-20T09:48:16-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        In the past 30 years, the population of prisoners in the United States has expanded almost 5-fold, correctional facilities are increasingly overcrowded, and more of the country's disadvantaged populations&#8212racial minorities, women, people with mental illness, and people with communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, hepatitis C, and tuberculosis&#8212are under correctional supervision. 
<p>
Because prisoners face restrictions on liberty and autonomy, have limited privacy, and often receive inadequate health care, they require specific protections when involved in research, particularly in today's correctional settings. Given these issues, the Department of Health and Human Services' Office for Human Research Protections commissioned the Institute of Medicine to review the ethical considerations regarding research involving prisoners. 
<p>
The resulting analysis contained in this book, Ethical Considerations for Research Involving Prisoners, emphasizes five broad actions to provide prisoners involved in research with critically important protections: 
<p>
 &#8226 expand the definition of "prisoner";
<p>
 &#8226 ensure universally and consistently applied standards of protection; 
<p>
 &#8226 shift from a category-based to a risk-benefit approach to research review; 
<p>
 &#8226 update the ethical framework to include collaborative responsibility; and 
<p>
 &#8226 enhance systematic oversight of research involving prisoners.
        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11692">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Academic Science and Engineering Report of a Workshop</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11766"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2006:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11766#final</id>
    <published>2006-11-15T15:35:38-05:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        During the last 40 years, the number of women studying science and engineering (S&E) has increased dramatically. Nevertheless, women do not hold academic faculty positions in numbers that commensurate with their increasing share of the S&E talent pool. The discrepancy exists at both the junior and senior faculty levels. In December 2005, the National Research Council held a workshop to explore these issues. Experts in a number of disciplines met to address what sex-differences research tells us about capability, behavior, career decisions, and achievement; the role of organizational structures and institutional policy; cross-cutting issues of race and ethnicity; key research needs and experimental paradigms and tools; and the ramifications of their research for policy, particularly for evaluating current and potential academic faculty. <i>Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Academic Science and Engineering</i> consists of three elements: an introduction, summaries of panel discussions including public comment sessions, and poster abstracts.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11766">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/309'>Women and Minorities</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/348'>Higher Education</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/407'>Workforce and Labor Issues</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Globalization, Biosecurity, and the Future of the Life Sciences</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11567"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2006:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11567#final</id>
    <published>2006-06-07T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Biomedical advances have made it possible to identify and manipulate features of living organisms in useful ways—leading to improvements in public health, agriculture, and other areas. The globalization of scientific and technical expertise also means that many scientists and other individuals around the world are generating breakthroughs in the life sciences and related technologies. The risks posed by bioterrorism and the proliferation of biological weapons capabilities have increased concern about how the rapid advances in genetic engineering and biotechnology could enable the production of biological weapons with unique and unpredictable characteristics. <i>Globalization, Biosecurity, and the Future of Life Sciences</i> examines current trends and future objectives of research in public health, life sciences, and biomedical science that contain applications relevant to developments in biological weapons 5 to 10 years into the future and ways to anticipate, identify, and mitigate these dangers.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11567">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/278'>Biology and Life Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/314'>Biotechnology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/328'>Prevention, Security and Response</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/472'>Biosecurity</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Fundamental Role of Science and Technology in International Development An Imperative for the U.S. Agency for International Development</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11583"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2006:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11583#final</id>
    <published>2006-05-24T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        In October 2003 the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the National Research Council (NRC) entered into a cooperative agreement. The agreement called for the NRC to examine selected aspects of U.S. foreign assistance activities—primarily the programs of the USAID—that have benefited or could benefit from access to strong science, technology, and medical capabilities in the United States or elsewhere. After considering the many aspects of the role of science and technology (S&T) in foreign assistance, the study led to the publication of <i>The Fundamental Role of Science and Technology in International Development</i>. In the book special attention is devoted to partnerships that involve the USAID together with international, regional, U.S. governmental, and private sector organizations in fields such as heath care, agriculture and nutrition, education and job creation, and energy and the environment. This book explores specific programmatic, organizational, and personnel reforms that would increase the effective use of S&T to meet the USAID's goals while supporting larger U.S. foreign policy objectives.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11583">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/280'>Conflict and Security Issues</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/327'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reaping the Benefits of Genomic and Proteomic Research Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation,  and Public Health</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11487"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2006:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11487#final</id>
    <published>2006-03-09T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        The patenting and licensing of human genetic material and proteins represents an extension of intellectual property (IP) rights to naturally occurring biological material and scientific information, much of it well upstream of drugs and other disease therapies. This report concludes that IP restrictions rarely impose significant burdens on biomedical research, but there are reasons to be apprehensive about their future impact on scientific advances in this area. The report recommends 13 actions that policy-makers, courts, universities, and health and patent officials should take to prevent the increasingly complex web of IP protections from getting in the way of potential breakthroughs in genomic and proteomic research. It endorses the National Institutes of Health guidelines for technology licensing, data sharing, and research material exchanges and says that oversight of compliance should be strengthened. It recommends enactment of a statutory exception from infringement liability for research on a patented invention and raising the bar somewhat to qualify for a patent on upstream research discoveries in biotechnology. With respect to genetic diagnostic tests to detect patient mutations associated with certain diseases, the report urges patent holders to allow others to perform the tests for purposes of verifying the results.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11487">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/278'>Biology and Life Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/317'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/278'>Biology and Life Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/314'>Biotechnology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Expanding Access to Research Data Reconciling Risks and Opportunities</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11434"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11434#final</id>
    <published>2005-11-11T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        Policy makers need information about the nation—ranging from trends in the overall
economy down to the use by individuals of Medicare—in order to evaluate existing
programs and to develop new ones. This information often comes from research
based on data about individual people, households, and businesses and other organizations,
collected by statistical agencies.
The benefit of increasing data accessibility to researchers and analysts is better
informed public policy. To realize this benefit, a variety of modes for data access—
including restricted access to confidential data and unrestricted access to appropriately
altered public-use data—must be used. The risk of expanded access to potentially
sensitive data is the increased probability of breaching the confidentiality of the
data and, in turn, eroding public confidence in the data collection enterprise.
Indeed, the statistical system of the United States ultimately depends on the willingness
of the public to provide the information on which research data are based.
<i>Expanding Access to Research Data</i> issues guidance on how to more fully exploit
these tradeoffs. The panel's recommendations focus on needs highlighted by legal,
social, and technological changes that have occurred during the last decade.
        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11434">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/279'>Computers and Information Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/323'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/279'>Computers and Information Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/320'>Information Security and Privacy</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/477'>Surveys and Statistics</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/478'>Surveys and Statistics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/478'>Surveys and Statistics</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ethical Considerations for Research on Housing-Related Health Hazards Involving Children</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11450"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11450#final</id>
    <published>2005-11-10T00:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <i>Ethical Considerations for Research on Housing-Related Health Hazards Involving Children</i>
explores the ethical issues posed when conducting research designed to identify,
understand, or ameliorate housing-related health hazards among children. Such
research involves children as subjects and is conducted in the home and in communities.
It is often conducted with children in low-income families given the disproportionate
prevalence of housing-related conditions such as lead poisoning, asthma,
and fatal injuries among these children. This book emphasizes five key elements to
address the particular ethical concerns raised by these characteristics: involving the
affected community in the research and responding to their concerns; ensuring that
parents understand the essential elements of the research; adopting uniform federal
guidelines for such research by all sponsors (Subpart D of 45 CFR 46); providing guidance
on key terms in the regulations; and viewing research oversight as a system with
important roles for researchers, IRBs and their research institutions, sponsors and regulators
of research, and the community.
        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11450">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/303'>Children, Youth and Families</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/288'>Health and Medicine</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/398'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Policy Implications of International Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Scholars in the United States</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11289"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11289#final</id>
    <published>2005-09-12T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        Policy Implications of International Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Scholars in the United States explores the role and impact of students and scholars on US educational institutions and the US economy. The nation has drawn increasingly on human resources abroad for its science and engineering workforce. However, competition for talent has grown as other countries have expanded their research infrastructure and created more opportunities for international students. The report discusses trends in international student enrollments, stay rates, and examines the impact of visa policies on international mobility of the highly skilled.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11289">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/282'>Education</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/352'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Opportunities in High Magnetic Field Science</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11211"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11211#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-26T00:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        High-field magnets—those that operate at the limits of the mechanical and/or electromagnetic properties of their structural materials—are used as research tools in a variety of scientific disciplines. The study of high magnetic fields themselves is also important in many areas such as astrophysics. Because of their importance in scientific research and the possibility of new breakthroughs, the National Science Foundation asked the National Research Council to assess the current state of and future prospects for high-field science and technology in the United States. This report presents the results of that assessment. It focuses on scientific and technological challenges and opportunities, and not on specific program activities. The report provides findings and recommendations about important research directions, the relative strength of U.S. efforts compared to other countries, and ways in which the program can operate more effectively.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11211">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/290'>Math, Chemistry, and Physics</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/412'>Policy, Reviews and Evaluations</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Digital Dilemma Intellectual Property in the Information Age</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9601"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9601#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Imagine sending a magazine article to 10 friends-making photocopies, putting them in envelopes, adding postage, and mailing them. Now consider how much easier it is to send that article to those 10 friends as an attachment to e-mail. Or to post the article on your own site on the World Wide Web.</p>
<p>The ease of modifying or copying digitized material and the proliferation of computer networking have raised fundamental questions about copyright and patent—intellectual property protections rooted in the U.S. Constitution. Hailed for quick and convenient access to a world of material, the Internet also poses serious economic issues for those who create and market that material. If people can so easily send music on the Internet for free, for example, who will pay for music?</p>
<p>This book presents the multiple facets of digitized intellectual property, defining terms, identifying key issues, and exploring alternatives. It follows the complex threads of law, business, incentives to creators, the American tradition of access to information, the international context, and the nature of human behavior. Technology is explored for its ability to transfer content and its potential to protect intellectual property rights. The book proposes research and policy recommendations as well as principles for policymaking.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9601">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/277'>Behavioral and Social Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/306'>Law and Justice</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Responsible Science Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume II</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/2091"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/2091#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Volume II of <i>Responsible Science</i> includes background papers and selected institutional reports, policies, and procedures that were used to develop Volume I. Topics discussed include traditions of mentorship in science; data handling practices in the biological sciences; academic policies and standards governing the conduct of research practices; congressional interest in issues of misconduct and integrity in science; the regulatory experience of human subjects research; and the roles of scientific and engineering societies in fostering research integrity.</p>
<p>The panel also considers numerous institutional policy statements adopted by research universities and professional societies that address different aspects of misconduct or integrity in science. These statements have been selected to convey the diverse approaches for addressing such matters within research institutions.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/2091">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/2054"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/2054#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>As technological developments multiply around the globe—even as the patenting of human genes comes under serious discussion—nations, companies, and researchers find themselves in conflict over intellectual property rights (IPRs). Now, an international group of experts presents the first multidisciplinary look at IPRs in an age of explosive growth in science and technology.</p>
<p>This thought-provoking volume offers an update on current international IPR negotiations and includes case studies on software, computer chips, optoelectronics, and biotechnology—areas characterized by high development cost and easy reproducibility. The volume covers these and other issues:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Modern economic theory as a basis for approaching international IPRs.</li>
    <li>U.S. intellectual property practices versus those in Japan, India, the European Community, and the developing and newly industrializing countries.</li>
    <li>Trends in science and technology and how they affect IPRs.</li>
    <li>Pros and cons of a uniform international IPRs regime versus a system reflecting national differences.</li>
</ul>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/2054">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/304'>Economics</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Role of Environmental NGOs: Russian Challenges, American Lessons Proceedings of a Workshop</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10240"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10240#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>An NRC committee was established to work with a Russian counterpart group in conducting a workshop in Moscow on the effectiveness of Russian environmental NGOs in environmental decision-making and prepared proceedings of this workshop, highlighting the successes and difficulties faced by NGOs in Russia and the United States.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10240">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Knowledge and Diplomacy Science Advice in the United Nations System</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10577"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10577#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        In the international effort to advance human health, welfare, and development while better managing and conserving the environment and natural resources, there is a clear and growing recognition of the role of scientific and technical knowledge in global governance. This has created an urgent need for the United Nations to equip itself with the capability to bring scientific knowledge to inform international decision making. Given the complexity and diversity of United Nations programs, organs, and mandates, this report focuses on the main functions of the United Nations that affect international governance in the fields related to sustainable development, with reference to the taxonomy of the key United Nations organs in which these functions are undertaken. Efforts have been made to ensure that the major categories of United Nations organs have been covered and therefore the results of the review are representative of the functioning of the United Nations system.         <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10577">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/278'>Biology and Life Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/314'>Biotechnology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Impact of Academic Research on Industrial Performance</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10805"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10805#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Drawing on the findings of sector-specific workshops, e-mail surveys, research literature, expert testimony, and committee and panel members' expertise, this National Academy of Engineering study assesses the qualitative impact of academic research on five industries—network systems and communications; medical devices and equipment; aerospace; transportation, distribution, and logistics services; and financial services. The book documents the range and significance of academic research contributions to the five industries—comparing the importance of different types of contributions, the multi- and interdisciplinary nature of these contributions, and the multiple vectors by which academic research is linked to each industry. The book calls for action to address six cross-cutting challenges to university-industry interactions: the growing disciplinary and time-horizon-related imbalances in federal R&D funding, barriers to university-industry interaction in service industries, the critical role of academic research in the advancement of information technology, the role of academic research in the regulation of industry, the impact of technology transfer activities on core university research and education missions, and the search for new pathways and mechanisms to enhance the contributions of academic research to industry. The book also includes findings and recommendations specific to each industry.</p>
        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10805">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/304'>Economics</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/279'>Computers and Information Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/322'>Internet and Networking</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Patent System for the 21st Century</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10976"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10976#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The U.S. patent system is in an accelerating race with human ingenuity and investments in innovation. In many respects the system has responded with admirable flexibility, but the strain of continual technological change and the greater importance ascribed to patents in a knowledge economy are exposing weaknesses including questionable patent quality, rising transaction costs, impediments to the dissemination of information through patents, and international inconsistencies. A panel including a mix of legal expertise, economists, technologists, and university and corporate officials recommends significant changes in the way the patent system operates.</p>
<p><i>A Patent System for the 21st Century</i> urges creation of a mechanism for post-grant challenges to newly issued patents, reinvigoration of the non-obviousness standard to quality for a patent, strengthening of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, simplified and less costly litigation, harmonization of the U.S., European, and Japanese examination process, and protection of some research from patent infringement liability.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10976">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Report of the Treasurer to the Council for the Year Ended December 31, 2004</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11342"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11342#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This report, <em>Treasurer's Report to the Council of the National Academy of Sciences</em>, presents the financial position and results of operations as well as a review of the endowment and trust activities of our Academy for the year ended December 31, 2004. <br />
 </p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11342">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cooperative Stewardship Managing the Nation's Multidisciplinary User Facilities for Research with Synchrotron Radiation, Neutrons, and High Magnetic Fields</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9705"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9705#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The Committee on Developing a Federal Materials Facilities Strategy was appointed by the National Research Council (NRC) in response to a request by the federal agencies involved in funding and operating multidisciplinary user facilities for research with synchrotron radiation, neutrons, and high magnetic fields. Starting in August 1996, a series of conversations and meetings was held among NRC staff and officials from the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (Department of Commerce), and the National Institutes of Health. The agencies were concerned that facilities originally developed to support research in materials science were increasingly used by scientists from other fields—particularly the biological sciences—whose research was supported by agencies other than those responsible for the facilities. This trend, together with the introduction of several new, large user facilities in the last decade, led the agencies to seek advice on the possible need for interagency cooperation in the management of these federal research facilities.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9705">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/284'>Engineering and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/364'>Materials</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>National Research Initiative A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9844"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9844#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Our nation faces daunting challenges to its food and fiber system and to the condition of our natural resources in the coming decades. Rapid increases in world population and the pressure on resources generated by increasing per capita consumption as a result of increasing per capita income challenge the very basis of our standard of living—our food, fiber, and natural-resource base. As the nation faces the challenges, new technologies and new information systems are changing the face of biologic research.</p>
<p>The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) has traditionally been the nation's primary public research engine in food, fiber, and natural resources. The National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program (NRI) is a small part of that USDA research effort, but it accounts for a substantial portion of the nation's merit-based peer-reviewed fundamental research efforts in food, fiber, and natural resources.</p>
<p>In 1997, USDA asked the National Research Council Board on Agriculture (now the Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources) to conduct an independent assessment of the NRI program. Specifically, USDA asked the Research Council to: perform a retrospective assessment of the quality and value of research funded by the program; determine whether the science and technology priorities in the major NRI programs are defined appropriately; assess how NRI activities complement other USDA programs, those of other federal agencies, and state programs in the private sector; and recommend the nature and content of changes for the future.</p>
<p>This report summarizes the results of the committee's analysis. Chapter 2 summarizes the value of food, fiber, and natural resources-research to the United States, focusing on economic contributions and rates of return of food and fiber research. The committee's analysis of the quality, value, fairness, relevance, and responsiveness of the NRI competitive grants program is presented in chapter 3. Chapter 4 presents the committee's analysis of the role and scope of the NRI, including its scientific objectives, its value in training and education, and its complementarity with other research activities. The committee's analysis of NRI's priority-setting process and its research priorities is given in chapter 5. The committee's analysis of organizational and funding issues is given in chapter 6. Chapter 7 presents the committee's recommendations to improve the effectiveness of the NRI program. Additional supporting materials are found in appendixes A through I.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9844">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Responsible Science Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1864"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1864#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p><i>Responsible Science</i> is a comprehensive review of factors that influence the integrity of the research process. Volume I examines reports on the incidence of misconduct in science and reviews institutional and governmental efforts to handle cases of misconduct.</p>
<p>The result of a two-year study by a panel of experts convened by the National Academy of Sciences, this book critically analyzes the impact of today's research environment on the traditional checks and balances that foster integrity in science.</p>
<p><i>Responsible Science</i> is a provocative examination of the role of educational efforts; research guidelines; and the contributions of individual scientists, mentors, and institutional officials in encouraging responsible research practices.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1864">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rights and Responsibilities of Participants in Networked Communities</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/4814"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/4814#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This book describes a number of social and legal issues as they relate to various members of electronically networked communities. After a brief introduction to relevant legal precedents and to the manner in which societies develop norms for social behavior, the book explores right and responsibilities related to free speech, vandalism, property interests, and privacy.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/4814">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/279'>Computers and Information Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/322'>Internet and Networking</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>National Issues in Science and Technology 1993</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/2096"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/2096#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This volume consists of four "white papers," prepared for the Clinton administration as it took office, on important national policy issues in which science and technology play a central role. Topics covered are science and technology leadership, climate change policy, technology policy and industrial innovation, and health care reform. Also included are brief summaries of ten potentially high impact reports issued by various committees of the National Research Council.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/2096">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Capitalizing on New Needs and New Opportunities Government-Industry Partnerships in Biotechnology and Information Technologies</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10281"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10281#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This report addresses a topic of recognized policy concern. To capture the benefits of substantial U.S. investments in biomedical R&D, parallel investments in a wide range of seemingly unrelated disciplines are also required. This report summarizes a major conference that reviewed our nation's R&D support for biotechnology and information technologies. The volume includes newly commissioned research and makes recommendations and findings concerning the important relationship between information technologies and biotechnology. It emphasizes the fall off in R&D investments needed to sustain the growth of the U.S. economy and to capitalize on the growing investment in biomedicine. It also encourages greater support for inter-disciplinary training to support new areas such as bioinformatics and urges more emphasis on and support for multi-disciplinary research centers.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10281">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/304'>Economics</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Capitalizing on Investments in Science and Technology</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/6442"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/6442#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>Although the United States is currently capitalizing on its investment in science and technology effectively, there remains much room for improvement. This volume identifies the ingredients for success in capitalizing on such investments to produce national benefits, assesses current U.S. performance, and identifies future challenges. The book cites specific examples and examines several cross-cutting issues. It explores the possibility that the national research portfolio is losing diversity as a result of less long-term research in critical fields such as networking and materials. It also examines the implications of imbalances in the supply of and demand for science and engineering talent in emerging interdisciplinary fields such as bioinformatics.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/6442">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/304'>Economics</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Science and Technology Leadership in American Government Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1967"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1967#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The government of the United States today is deeply involved in activities that have significant scientific and technical (S&T) components that are vitally important for economic productivity and technological competitiveness, national security, an improved environment, better health, and many other purposes. Leadership of the government's role in S&T is exercised by fewer than 100 positions, most of them presidentially appointed and Senate confirmed. Yet there is considerable evidence of increasing difficulty in filling and keeping filled these seemingly prestigious positions.</p>
<p>This book by a distinguished panel composed mostly of former presidential appointees delves into the reasons these federal S&T-related positions are vacant, identifies the serious consequences, and recommends a series of changes to reduce the hurdles and disincentives posed by the appointment and confirmation process and to make the positions more attractive to top candidates.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1967">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Foreign Participation in U.S. Research and Development Asset or Liability?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/4922"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/4922#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>During the past decade, foreign participation in U.S. research and development—through acquisition of R&D-intensive businesses, links with universities, and other arrangements—has expanded rapidly.</p>
<p>This emergence of foreign influence has drawn a mixed response—some regard the trend as a positive corollary to the expanding involvement of U.S.-owned companies in national markets abroad. Others consider it a net liability for Americans that often benefits foreign companies and their home economies at U.S. expense.</p>
<p>There exists a large gap in expert and public understanding of the drivers, nature, and consequences of foreign participation in the nation's technology enterprise. This volume seeks to close this gap and reviews:</p>
<ul>
    <li>The nature of R&D activities and how they contribute to economic development.</li>
    <li>The causes, scope, and nature of foreign involvement in U.S.-based R&D activity and the associated costs, risks, benefits, and opportunities of this trend.</li>
    <li>The merits and liabilities of policies to regulate foreign R&D participation.</li>
</ul>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/4922">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/304'>Economics</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Implementing the Government Performance and Results Act for Research A Status Report</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10106"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10106#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2017-10-31T15:33:02-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        As requested by Congress and the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), this report assists federal agencies in crafting plans and reports that are responsive to the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA), OMB Guidance, and agency missions. Using a case study approach, the report identifies best practices used by individual agencies to evaluate the performance and results of their science and technology programs. The report takes into account individual agencies' missions and how science and technology programs and human resource needs are factored into agency GPRA plans. Specific applications of recommendations are included from COSEPUP's earlier report entitled Evaluating Federal Research Programs: Research and the Government Performance and Results Act.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10106">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/281'>Earth Sciences</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/331'>Climate, Weather and Meteorology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Measuring and Sustaining the New Economy Report of a Workshop</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10282"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10282#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        Sustaining the New Economy will require public policies that remain relevant to the rapid technological changes that characterize it. While data and its timely analysis are key to effective policy-making, we do not yet have adequate statistical images capturing changes in productivity and growth brought about by the information technology revolution. This report on a STEP workshop highlights the need for more information and the challenges faced in measuring the New Economy and sustaining its growth.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10282">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/304'>Economics</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Envisioning a 21st Century Science and Engineering Workforce for the United States Tasks for University, Industry, and Government</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10647"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10647#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        At the request of the Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable (GUIRR), Shirley Ann Jackson, President of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, presents in this brief paper her views of the challenges of the 21st century for the science and engineering workforce. Dr. Jackson identifies factors that she believes are contributing to a declining science and engineering workforce, describes the risks and consequences of this decline, and proposes specific, short-term tasks for universities, industry, and the federal government to strengthen and revitalize the workforce.        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10647">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/407'>Workforce and Labor Issues</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information Two Volumes</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10866"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10866#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>The launch of Sputnik caused a flurry of governmental activity in science information. The 1958 International Conference on Scientific Information (ICSI) was held in Washington from Nov. 16-21, 1958 and sponsored by NSF, NAS, and American Documentation Institute, the predecessor to the American Society for Information Science. In 1959, 20,000 copies of the two volume proceedings were published by NAS and included 75 papers (1600 pages) by dozens of pioneers from seven areas such as:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Literature and reference needs of scientists</li>
    <li>Function and effectiveness of A & I services</li>
    <li>Effectiveness of Monographs, Compendia, and Specialized Centers</li>
    <li>Organization of information for storage and search: comparative characteristics of existing systems</li>
    <li>Organization of information for storage and retrospective search: intellectual problems and equipment considerations</li>
    <li>Organization of information for storage and retrospective search: possibility for a general theory</li>
    <li>Responsibilities of Government, Societies, Universities, and industry for improved information services and research.</li>
</ul>
<p>It is now an out of print classic in the field of science information studies.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10866">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Maintaining High Scientific Quality at Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11009"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11009#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>In recent years, there has been concern about security and operations management at Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories (LANL and LLNL). As a result, Congress directed the Department of Energy (DOE) to hold open competitions for the management and operations (M&O) contracts for both LANL and LLNL. The quality of the scientific programs, however, did not appear to be a factor in that action, and the DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) wanted to ensure that the contract competitions preserve the high-quality science and engineering currently being performed at the labs. It asked the NRC to recommend how best the NNSA can create meaningful qualification and selection discriminators to help ensure world-class scientific quality is maintained in programs and activities at LANL and LLNL. This report presents those recommendations along with other important factors that should be considered in developing the request for proposals for the upcoming contract competition.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11009">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/285'>Environment and Environmental Studies</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/377'>Water Quality</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Future National Research Policies Within the Industrialized Nations Report of a Symposium</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1975"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1975#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This book is a summary and proceedings of a symposium sponsored by the Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable and the National Science Foundation. It includes presentations by senior government science policy officials and leading scientists who are directly involved in the research and higher education policy formulation processes in various countries. Included are their assessments of current challenges to their national research systems, descriptions of national strategies for meeting these challenges, and a discussion of options for national research systems in the twenty-first century.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1975">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Trends in the Early Careers of Life Scientists</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/6244"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/6244#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>In each year between 1994 and 1996, more than 7,000 individuals received a Ph.D. in life-science, and the number of graduates is rising sharply. If present trends continue, about half of those graduates will have found permanent positions as independent researchers within ten years after graduation. These statistics—and the labor market situation they reflect—can be viewed either positively or negatively depending on whether one is a young scientist seeking a career or an established investigator whose productivity depends on the labor provided by an abundant number of graduate students.</p>
<p>This book examines the data concerning the production of doctorates in life-science and the changes in the kinds of positions graduates have obtained. It discusses the impact of those changes and suggests ways to deal with the challenges of supply versus demand for life-science Ph.D. graduates. <i>Trends in the Early Careers of Life Scientists</i> will serve as an information resource for young scientists deciding on career paths and as a basis for discussion by educators and policymakers as they examine the current system of education linked to research and decide if changes in that system are needed.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/6244">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/289'>Industry and Labor</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/407'>Workforce and Labor Issues</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bits of Power Issues in Global Access to Scientific Data</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/5504"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/5504#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p><i>Bits of Power</i> assesses the state of international exchange of data in the natural sciences, identifying strengths, weaknesses, and challenges. The book makes recommendations about access to scientific data derived from public funding. It examines trends in the electronic transfer and management of scientific data, pressure toward commericalization of scientific data, the implications of proposed changes to intellectual property laws, and improving access to scientific data by and from the developing world.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/5504">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/279'>Computers and Information Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/321'>Information Technology</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/279'>Computers and Information Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/320'>Information Security and Privacy</a> | <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/471'>Research and Data</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Fateful Choices The Future of the U.S. Academic Research Enterprise</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1980"/>
    <id>tag:nap.edu,2005:https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1980#final</id>
    <published>2005-07-19T09:47:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>-0001-11-30T00:00:00-04:56</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The National Academies Press</name>
      <uri>https://www.nap.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.nap.edu">
      <![CDATA[
        <p><strong>Final Book Now Available</strong></p>
        <p>This volume describes a vision for the future of U.S. academic research and the near-term actions and policies required to maintain the quality of academic research in the United States. It also describes longer-term strategic considerations for the enterprise in the next century, concluding with a discussion of new approaches to decision making within the academic research enterprise.</p>        <p>[<a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1980">Read the full report</a>]</p>        <p><strong>Topics:</strong> <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a> &raquo; <a href='https://www.nap.edu/topic/423'>Policy for Science and Technology</a></p><br />
      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
